Preview

Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety

Advanced search

IMPROVEMENT OF SAFETY ACTIVITIES DURING FOREST FIRE EMERGENCY

https://doi.org/10.18322/PVB.2018.27.10.56-65

Abstract

Introduction. The woods have the crucial functions on decrease of negative impact natural and anthropogenous character to the ecosystems of Earth. As difficult objects of research, the woods depend on a host of factors but unfortunately it is paid attention not to all of them, especially when forecasting of fire situation in the woods. Research objective — carrying out of an analysis of modern forecasting methods of fire-dangerous situation and development of the recommendations for improvement of complex of activities for prevention and mitigation of consequences of forest fires.

Methods. The leading documents and approaches used for forecasting of fire-dangerous situation, realization of actions for the prevention and elimination of emergency situations were analyzed.

Results. It is evaluated that the method of calculation of fire hazard index under the terms of weather determined by the order of Federal Forestry Agency doesn’t consider the speed of a wind and accumulated precipitation that has essential impact on reliability of the defined degree of fire hazard. For the elimination of this shortcoming it is offered to use corresponding correction coefficients. Geometrical characteristics of forest fire have essential impact on a choice of methods of fire extinguishing. The technique of landscape fire extinguishing used simplifies its form to a square that leads to increase of calculations error and decrease efficiency of planning and carrying out of accident rescue works. It is offered to use an ellipsoid or sector which calculation of the areas isn’t required difficult mathematical calculations, but possesses a sufficient share of accuracy. Improvement of a complex of organizational, legal and engineering and technical measures is directed on increase of efficiency of implementation of measures for the prevention and fight against forest fires.

Conclusion. The research allows to make a conclusion that the existing methods and actions not fully ensure safety of the population and territories at threat of emergence of natural fires. The offered measures directed on improvement of the available expected methods will allow to increase efficiency of the forecast and realization of accident and rescue works during natural fires.

About the Authors

A. G. Nesterenko
Saint Petersburg University of State Fire Service of Emercom of Russia.
Russian Federation

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Professor of Population and Territory Protection Department.

Moscowskiy Avenue, 149, Saint Petersburg, 196105.



S. I. Shepelyuk
Санкт-Петербургский университет ГПС МЧС России.
Russian Federation
Candidate of Military Sciences, Professor of Population and Territory Protection Department.


V. A. Zokoev
Санкт-Петербургский университет ГПС МЧС России.
Russian Federation
Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Chief of Civil and Territory Defense Department.


B. Babic
Technical High School.
Czechoslovakia

PhD, Professor.

 Školska, 1, Novi Sad, 21000, Serbia.



References

1. Kaibichev I. A., Kaibicheva E. I. Fire index in Russian Federation for 2011-2015 years. Pozharo- vzryvobezopasnost / Fire and Explosion Safety, 2017, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 23-30 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2017.26.03.23-30.

2. Brushlinskiy N. N., Sokolov S. V., Grigoryeva M. P. Major fire risks analysis in the countries of the world and in Russia. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost / Fire and Explosion Safety, 2017, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 72-80. DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2017.26.02.72-80.

3. World Fire Statistics. Center of Fire Statistics CTIF, 2005-2017, Reports No. 10-22. Available at: https://www.ctif.org/index.php/world-fire-statistics (Accessed 10 April 2018).

4. Korobko V. B., Glukhovenko Yu. M., Ovchinskiy A. S., Gurlev I. V. Updating of fire safety require-ments based on the risk-based approach. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost / Fire and Explosion Safety, 2018, vol. 27, no. 6,pp. 7-17 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2018.27.06.7-17.

5. Eremina T. Yu., Nazarov A. A. Basis of research and information model of fire safety management for territorial entity (for Tyva Republic). Pozharovzryvobezopasnost / Fire and Explosion Safety, 2017, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 6-14 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2017.26.04.6-14.

6. Forest Code ofthe Russian Federation. Federal law of the Russian Federation on 4 December 2006 No. 200-FZ (ed. on 3 August 2018; is valid from 1 September 2018) (in Russian). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902017047 (Accessed 14 August 2018).

7. Terebnev V. V., Semenov A. O., Smirnov V. A., Tarakanov D. V. Analysis and support solutions that arise when putting out large fire. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost / Fire and Explosion Safety, 2010, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 51-57 (in Russian).

8. Terebnev V. V., Semenov A. O., Tarakanov D. V. Decision making theoretical basis of management on fire. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost / Fire and Explosion Safety, 2012, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 14-17 (in Russian).

9. Van den Bosch C. J. H., Weterings R. A. P. M. (eds.). CPR14E. Methods for the calculation of physical effects — Due to releases of hazardous materials (liquids and gases). “Yellow Book”. 3rd ed. Hague, Gevaarlijke Stoffen, 2005. 870 p. Available at: http://content.publicatiereeksgevaarlijkestoffen.nl/docu- ments/PGS2/PGS2-1997-v0.1-physical-effects.pdf (Accessed 4 September 2018).

10. Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis. 2nd ed. New-York, Wiley-AIChE, 2010. 748 p. DOI: 10.1002/9780470935422.

11. Markowski A. S., Mannan M. S., Kotynia (Bigoszewska) A., Siuta D. Uncertainty aspects in process safety analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2010, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 446-454. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.02.005.

12. Nesterenko A. G., Nesterenko S. G., Shepelyuk S. I. Problems of improvement of complex of activities for the prevention of natural fires. In: Servis bezopasnosti v Rossii: opyt, problemy, perspektivy. Obespe- cheniye kompleksnoy bezopasnosti zhiznedeyatelnosti naseleniya: materialy IX Vserossiyskoy nauchno- prakticheskoy konferentsii [Safety Service in Russia: Experience, Problems, Prospects. Providing Complex Health and Safety of the Population]. Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg University of State Fire Service of Emercom of Russia Publ., 2017, pp. 229-233 (in Russian).

13. Grinchenko B. B., Tarakanov D. V. Safety management model for firefighting in unsuitable for breathing environment. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost / Fire and Explosion Safety, 2018, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 45-51 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2018.27.06.45-51.

14. About the adoption ofclassification ofnaturalfire hazard of the woods and classification of fire hazard in the woods under the terms of weather. Order of Federal Forestry Agency on 5 July 2011 No. 287 (in Russian). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902289183 (Accessed 14 September 2018).

15. Kolpakov V. F. Parametric identification of models of forest fires. Bezopasnost’ zhiznedeatel’nosti / Life Safety, 2012, no. 5, pp. 39-44 (in Russian).

16. Kolpakov V. F. Application of fuzzy modeling for information support of decision-making in extingui¬shing forest fires. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost / Fire and Explosion Safety, 2017, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 65-73 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2017.26.07.65-73.

17. Carslaw H. S., Jaeger J. C. Conduction of heat in solids. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 1959. 517 p. Available at: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/conduction-of-heat-in-solids- 9780198533689?cc=ru&lang=en& (Accessed 5 September 2018).

18. Rohsenow W. M., Hartnett J. P., Ganic E. N. Handbook of heat transfer fundamentals. 2nd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1985. 1440 p. Available at: http://160592857366.free.fr/joe/ebooks/Mecha- nical%20Engineering%20Books%20Collection/HEAT%20TRANSFER/handbook %20of %20 HeatTransfer.pdf (Accessed 2 September 2018).

19. The method of landscape fires suppression. Approved of Emercom of Russia on 14 September 2015 No. 2-4-87-32-LB (in Russian). Available at: http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/ doc/71145496/ (Accessed 14 September 2018).

20. Nelson H. E., Forssell E. W. Use of small-scale test data in hazard analysis. Fire Safety Science, 1994, vol. 4, pp. 971-982. DOI: 10.3801/iafss.fss.4-971.

21. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. 3rd ed. Quincy, Massachusetts, National Fire Protec¬tion Association, Inc., 2002.1604 p. Available at: http://ogneborec.su/files/uploads/ files/0460561_ 8A68C_sfpe_handbook_of_fire_protection_engineering.pdf (Accessed 2 September 2018).

22. Sharovarnikov A. F., Korolchenko D. A. Fighting fires of carbon dioxide in the closed buildings. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, vol. 475-476, pp. 1344-1350. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ amm.475-476.1344.

23. Fire safety in timber buildings. Technical guideline for Europe. SP Report 2010:19. Available at: https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/doc/Fire_Timber_Ch 5-7.pdf (Accessed 21 August 2018).

24. Brushlinskiy N. N., Shebeko Yu. N. (eds.). Pozharnyye riski. Vypusk 4. Upravleniye pozharnymi riskami [Fire Risks. Issue 4. Fire Risk Management]. Moscow, VNIIPO of Emercom of Russia Publ., 2006. 148 p. (in Russia).

25. BenichouN., Kashef A. H., Reid I., Hadjisophocleous G. V., TorviD. A., Morinville G. FIERAsystem: a fire risk assessment tool to evaluate fire safety in industrial buildings and large spaces. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 2005, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 145-172. DOI: 10.1177/1042391505049437.

26. Hall J. R., Jr. Overview of standards for fire risk assessment. Fire Science and Technology, 2006, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 55-61. DOI: 10.3210/fst.25.55.

27. Information about forest fire situation in the territory of subjects of the Russian Federation from 30.06.2018. FBU “Avialesoohrana”, Federal Forest Agency (in Russian). Available at: https://avia- les.ru/popup.aspx?news=4732 (Accessed 30 August 2018).

28. Matyushin A. V. (general ed.). Pozhary ipozharnaya bezopasnost v 2015 godu. Statisticheskiy sbornik [Fires and fire safety in 2015. Statistical yearbook]. Moscow. VNIIPOPubl., 2016.124 p. (in Russian).

29. Minaev V. A., Topolskiy N. G., Korobets B. N., Dao Anh Tuan. Models of optimal allocation of fire service human resourses on the basis of territories fire risks typology. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost / Fire and Explosion Safety, 2018, vol. 27, no. 6,pp. 18-30 (inRussian). DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2018.27.06.18-30.


Review

For citations:


Nesterenko A.G., Shepelyuk S.I., Zokoev V.A., Babic B. IMPROVEMENT OF SAFETY ACTIVITIES DURING FOREST FIRE EMERGENCY. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2018;27(10):56-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18322/PVB.2018.27.10.56-65

Views: 520


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-7493 (Print)
ISSN 2587-6201 (Online)