WAYS OF IMPROVEMENT OF THE TECHNIQUE OF ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF CHEMICAL DANGER IN TRANSIT CHEMICALLY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE BY MOTOR TRANSPORT

Introduction. Currently, the risk assessment method is widely used at the facilities. This is true in determining the chemical hazards arising in the storage infrastructure and transport of chemically dangerous substances. The basis of risk assessment analysis of chemical hazard is forecasting of the consequences of chemical accidents and contamination areas.

Methods. As a result, it was revealed that the methods contain wrong assumptions. In particular, the actual area of chemically dangerous substance spill and its absorption into the underlying surface are not taken into account. These assumptions are proposed to be eliminated by use spreading and infiltration coefficient in the risk assessment method of chemical hazards. These coefficients are calculated on the basis of experiments to determine the area of the spill and the proportion of infiltration in the underlying surface of the main types of chemically dangerous substance. The spreading surface coefficient clarifies the main features that effect on evaporation time, the area of the spill and the thickness of the film of chemically dangerous substance spill on the underlying surface.

Results and discussion. Infiltration coefficient determines the amount of chemically dangerous sub­stance absorbed into the underlying surface. In addition, it is not taken into account in the secondary cloud formation of chemical contamination. The article presents the coefficients that are calculated for the main types of chemically dangerous substance and ways to obtain them. An assessment of the chemical hazard was carried out using an improved methodology in the Republic of Mordovia. The procedure is compared with other methods.

Conclusion. Calculations show that the proposed methodology for chemical risk assessment will allow more accurate forecasting. It is better to assess the risk of chemical hazards.

1. Fire protection standards 105-03. Determination of categories of rooms, buildings and external instal¬lations on explosion andfire hazard. Order of Emercom of Russian on 18.06.2003 No. 314 (in Russian). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200032102 (Accessed 1 March 2018).

2. SO 11-04-AKTNP-006-2006. Methodology for assessing the risk level ofoperation ofmain oil product pipelines OAO “AK “Transnefteprodukt”. Moscow, OAO“AK“Transnefteprodukt” Publ., 2006. 108 p. (in Russian).

3. On the approval of technique of determination of settlement sizes offire risk on production objects. Order of Emercom of Russia on 10.07.2009 No. 404 (in Russian). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/do- cument/902170886 (Accessed 14 January 2018).

4. Savchuk O. N. Khimicheskaya bezopasnost. Sistemnyy analizprognozirovaniya vozmozhnykhposled- stviy pri avariyakh (razrusheniyakh) khimicheski opasnykh obyektov. Monografiya [Chemical safety. System analysis of the forecasting of possible consequences during accidents (destruction) of che¬mically dangerous objects. Monograph]. Saarbrucken, Lambert Academic Publishing, 2013. 456 p. (in Russian).

5. Fthenakis V. M. HGSYSTEM: a review, critique, and comparison with other models. Journal of Loss Pre¬vention in the Process Industries, 1999, vol. 12, no. 6,pp. 525-531. DOI: 10.1016/s0950-4230(99)00029-7.

6. Erkut E., Verter V. A framework for hazardous materials transport risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 1995, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 589-601. DOI: 10.1111 /j.1539-6924.1995.tb00755.x.

7. Bubbico R., Di Cave S., Mazzarotta B. Risk analysis for road and rail transport of hazardous materials: a simplified approach. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2004, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 477-482. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2004.08.010.

8. Bubbico R., Maschio G., Mazzarotta B., Milazzo M. F., Parisi E. Risk management of road and rail transport of hazardous materials in Sicily. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, vol. 19, no. 1,pp. 32-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.05.011.

9. Xie Y., Lu W., Wang W., Quadrifoglio L. A multimodal location and routing model for hazardous materials transportation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, vol. 227-228, pp. 135-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.028.

10. Leonelli P., Bonvicini S., Spadoni G. New detailed numerical procedures for calculating risk measures in hazardous materials transportation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1999, vol. 12, no. 6,pp. 507-515. DOI: 10.1016/s0950-4230(99)00023-6.

11. Erkut E., Verter V. Modeling of transport risk for hazardous materials. Operations Research, 1998, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 625-642. DOI: 10.1287/opre.46.5.625.

12. WuZ., SunM. Statistic analysis and countermeasure study on 200 road transportation accidents of dan¬gerous chemicals. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2006, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 3-8. Available at: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-LDBK200602001.htm (Accessed 14 Junuary2018).

13. Rukovodstvopo otsenkepozharnogo riska dlyapromyshlennykhpredpriyatiy [Guidelines for the assess¬ment of fire risk for industrial enterprises]. Moscow, All-Russian Research Institute for Fire Protection of Emercom of Russia Publ., 2006 (in Russian). Available at: http://infosait.ru/norma_doc/49/ 49262/ index.htm (Accessed 7 May 2018).

14. Savchuk O. N. Features of forecasting of revealing of consequences at failures (destructions) of tanks with under abnormal condition chemically dangerous substances at transportation by motor transport. Problemy upravleniya riskami v tekhnosfere / Problems of Technosphere Risk Management, 2011, no. 1(17), pp. 40-50 (in Russian).

15. Stoessel F. Thermal safety of chemical processes: risk assessment and process design. Weinheim, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., 2008. 393 p.

16. Egeghy P. P., Vallero D. A., Hubal E. A. C. Exposure-based prioritization of chemicals for risk assess¬ment. Environmental Science & Policy, 2011, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 950-964. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci. 2011.07.010.

17. Perkins E. J., Ankley G. T., CroftonK. M., Garcia-ReyeroN., LaLone C. A., JohnsonM. S., Tietge J. E., Villeneuve D. L. Current perspectives on the use of alternative species in human health and ecological hazard assessments. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2013, vol. 121, no. 9, pp. 1002-1010. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1306638.

18. Samuel C., Keren N., Shelley M. C., Freeman S. A. Frequency analysis of hazardous material transpor¬tation incidents as a function of distance from origin to incident location. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 783-790. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.08.013.

19. Inanloo B., Tansel B. Explosion impacts during transport of hazardous cargo: GIS-based characteriza¬tion of overpressure impacts and delineation of flammable zones for ammonia. Journal of Environ¬mental Management, 2015, vol. 156, pp. 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.044.

20. Li C., Ren J., Wang H. A system dynamics simulation model of chemical supply chain transportation risk management systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2016, vol. 89, pp. 71-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.02.019.

21. Smolander S., He Q., Mogensen D., Zhou L., Back J., Ruuskanen T., Noe S., Guenther A., Aaltonen H., Kulmala M., Boy M. Comparing three vegetation monoterpene emission models to measured gas con¬centrations with a model of meteorology, air chemistry and chemical transport. Biogeosciences, 2014, vol. 11, issue 19, pp. 5425-5443. DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-5425-2014.

22. Savchuk O. N., Aksenov A. A. Features of the software implementation on a computer risk assessment chemical hazards of accidents of vehicles carrying dangerous chemical substances. Vestnik Sankt- Peterburgskogo universiteta Gosudarstvennoy protivopozharnoy sluzhby MChS Rossii / Herald of Saint Petersburg University of State Fire Service ofEmercom of Russia, 2015, no. 4, pp. 52-60 (in Rus¬sian).

23. Shein E. V. Kurs fiziki pochv [Course of soil physics]. Moscow, Moscow State University Publ., 2005. 432 p. (in Russian).

24. Chausov Yu. P. Flowability of extremely hazardous liquids on solid surfaces. In: Goryuchest ve- shchestv i khimicheskiye sredstva pozharotusheniya [Flammability of substances and chemical extin¬guishing agents]. Moscow, 1978, issue 4, pp. 37-46 (in Russian).

25. Altshul A. D., Zhivotovskiy L. S., Ivanov L. P. Gidravlika i aerodinamika [Hydraulics and aerodyna¬mics]. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1987. 414 p. (in Russian).

26. Savchuk O. N., Aksenov A. A. Prediction consequences of accidents by transport, transporting chemical hazardous substances. Inventor’s Certificate RU, No. 2015610163, publ. date 20.02.2015 (in Russian).

27. Agapov A. A., Lazukina I. O., Marukhlenko A. L., Marukhlenko S. L., Sofin A. S. Use of software package TOXI+Rlsk for fire risk assessment. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti / Occupational Safety in Industry, 2010, no. 1, pp. 46-52 (in Russian).