Updating of fire safety requirements based on the risk-based approach
https://doi.org/10.18322/pvb.2018.27.6.7-17
Abstract
Introduction. Analysis of contemporary trends and issues on improving regulatory oversight of activities in Europe and Russia showed that the society has shown increasing concern about the high risk of harm to economic activities in the form of lost profit from inaccurate and excessive regulation of relations in the model of the control and supervision activities, which are developing a variety of programs that bring private yet only fragmentary positive results, but they change the inaccurate and excessive essence of traditional control and supervisory activities.
The main (analytical) part. In Europe and in Russia there is implemented a relative assessment of risk of harm (the establishment of the conditional risk categories) in the frequency of scheduled audits, which was called “a risk-based approach”. A conditional approach to assessing the risk of harm to protected values cannot lead to clarification of the subj ect and elimination of the excessive nature of control and supervision.
Significant practical results of the reform of control and supervision will be achieved only as a result of a large-scale transition to a risk-oriented model of control and supervision, the essence of which is to identify mandatory requirements based on the calculation and scenario assessments of the risks of harm to protected values.
Theoretical and practical bases the risk-oriented model of control and supervision in the field of fire safety developed by a distinguished specialist, educator, and philosopher Vasily Ivanovich Kozlachkov that were used to develop the “Project of updating of mandatory fire safety requirements” for Priority programme “Reform of control and Supervisory activities”.
The paper presents a Description of the project of updating the mandatory requirements of fire safety, which implements the formula: first, to estimate the amount of damage to protected values, then select (choose or develop) commensurate with the damage of technical requirements of fire safety.
Conclusion. The implementation of the project of updating the mandatory requirements of fire safety will significantly increase the level of protection of people and property, improve the quality of control and supervision activities and reduce administrative pressure on entrepreneurs.
About the Authors
V. B. KorobkoRussian Federation
Doctor of Technical Sciences, Academician of National Academy of Fire Science, Head of Kozlachkov Institute
Bolshoy Kharitonyevskiy Lane, 9, of. 28, Moscow, 101000
Yu. M. Glukhovenko
Russian Federation
Doctor of Technical Sciences, Academician of National Academy of Fire Science, Advisor of Head
Orlikov Lane, 3, build. 1, Moscow, 107139
A. S. Ovchinskiy
Russian Federation
Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Professor of Department of Information Security, Educational and Research Department of Information Technology
Okruzhnoy Drive, 4, Moscow, 107061
I. V. Gurlev
Russian Federation
Doctor of Technical Sciences, Senior Researcher, Chief Researcher of Scientific Centre
Zoi and Aleksandra Kosmodemyanskikh St., 8, Moscow, 125171
References
1. Levshin L. M. Using risk-based approach at industrial enterprises (Part 1). Perspektivy nauki / Science Prospects, 2015, no. 3(66), pp. 162-167 (in Russian).
2. The concept of reforming the system of public service of the Russian Federation. Approved by the President of the Russian Federation No. 1496 on 15 August 2001 (in Russian). Available at: https://zakon-base.ru/content/base/59119 (Accessed 10 April 2018).
3. Risk-based approach. Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. 23 May 2013 (in Russian). Available at: https://www.osce.org/ru/eea/101949?download=true (Accessed 10 April 2018).
4. Regulatory and supervisory bodies of the member states of the Council of Europe responsible for carrying out verification and control activities in the economic sphere — structure, practices and examples'. ECU-PRECOP-TP-6/2015. Florentin Blanc, Giuseppe Ottomotor (ed.). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/16806d855a (Accessed 10 April 2018).
5. Plaksin S. M. (leading author), Zuyev A. G., Knutov A. V., Maksimova S. I., PolesskiyE. A., Semenov S. V., Trifonov V. A., Chaplinskiy A. V., Shabala Yu. I. Kontrolno-nadzornaya i razreshitelnaya deyatelnost Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Analiticheskiy doklad 2015 [Supervisory and licensing activities. Analytical report 2015]. Moscow, RSPP Publishing Flouse, 2016. 126 p. (in Russian).
6. The action plan (Road map) for improving control and oversight activities in the Russian Federation for 2016-2017. Order of Government of the Russian Federation on 01.04.2016 No. 559-r (in Russian). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/420346602 (Accessed 10 April 2018).
7. Reform of the monitoring and supervision activities. Priority program. Approved by the Presidium of the Presidential Council of the Russian Federation for Strategic Development and Priority Projects on 21 December 2016. Available at: http://ac.gov.ru/en/projects/014098.html (Accessed 6 March 2018).
8. Plaksin S. M. (leading author), Abuzyarova I. A., Balandina G. V., Dupan A. S., Knutov A. V., Polesskiy E. A., Reznikov A., Semenov S. V., Trifonov V. A., Chaplinskiy A. V., Shabala Yu. \. Kontrolno-nadzornaya i razreshitelnaya deyatelnost v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Analiticheskiy doklad 2017 [Supervisory and licensing activities in the Russian Federation. Analytical report 2017]. Moscow, RSPP Publishing Flouse, 2018. 124 p. (in Russian).
9. On technical regulation. Federal Law of Russian Federation on 27.12.2002 No. 184-FZ (ed. on 29.07.2017) (in Russian). Available at: http://files.stroyinfru/Data2/l/4294845/4294845855.htm (Accessed 10 April 2018).
10. Plaksin S. M. (leading author), Abuzyarova I. A., Danilov N. A., Zuyev A. G., Knutov A. V., Polesskiy E. A., Semenov S. V., Trifonov V. A., Chaplinskiy A. V., Shabala Yu. I. Kontrolno-nadzornaya i razreshitelnaya deyatelnost v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Analiticheskiy doklad 2016 [Supervisory and licensing activities. Analytical report 2016]. Moscow, RSPP Publishing Flouse, 2017. 141 p. (in Russian).
11. Kozlachkov V. I. (general ed.), Lobaev I. A. Osnovy gosudarstvennoypolitiki v oblastigosudarstvenrwgo pozharnogo nadzora [Fundamentals of state policy in the field of state fire supervision]. Moscow, State Fire Academy of Emercom of Russia Publ., 2014. 94 p. (in Russian).
12. Matyushin A. V. (general ed.). Pozhary ipozharnaya bezopasnost v 2015 godu. Statisticheskiy sbomik [Fires and fire safety in2015. Statistical yearbook].Moscow, VNllPO Publ.,2016.124p. (inRussian).
13. Zhavoronkov S. V., Kuznetsova O. V., Kuznetsov P. V., Makarova O. A., Mau V. A., Shadrin A. E., Anovskiy K. E. On the problem of deregulation of the Russian economy. Report of the Working Center for Economic Reforms under Government of Russian Federation, 2000 (in Russian). Available at: http://ofdp.ru/forum/rcer/index.shtml (Accessed 10 April 2018).
14. Bakayev V. V., Zavyalova L. D., Zuyev A. G., Kirzhimanov M. G., Knutov A. V., KovtunE. V., Maksimova S. 1., Plaksin S. M., Polesskiy E. A., Tolstykh N. I., Khanova E. P., Chaplinskiy A. V. Kontrolno- nadzornaya deyatelnost v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Analiticheskiy doklad 2012 [Supervisory activities in the Russian Federation. Analytical report 2012]. 2nd ed. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2013. 184 p. (in Russian).
15. World Fire Statistics. Center of Fire Statistics CTIF, 2005-2017, Reports No. 10-22. Available at: https://www.ctif org/index.php/world-fire-statistics (Accessed 10 April 2018).
Review
For citations:
Korobko V.B., Glukhovenko Yu.M., Ovchinskiy A.S., Gurlev I.V. Updating of fire safety requirements based on the risk-based approach. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2018;27(6):7-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18322/pvb.2018.27.6.7-17