Model for assessing the human influence on the sustainability of the special software of the computer-aided fire-explosion safety systems
https://doi.org/10.18322/pvb.2018.27.7-8.53-59
Abstract
Introduction. The oil and gas industry plays a key role in the Russian economy. In this regard, it is necessary to ensure the safety of facilities in this industry, in particular the fire safety of oil refineries. Computer-aided fire-explosion safety systems play an important role in protecting objects and detecting fires on them. At the same time, a key element in these systems is special software and the success of the computer-aided fire-explosion safety system depends on it. Since the software is developed and operated by a person, there is a scientific and technical problem, which is expressed in determining the function of human influence on the special software of computer-aided fire-explosion safety systems.
The work purpose is to assess the impact of human (programmer) on the stability of special software for computer-aided fire-explosion safety systems of oil refineries.
Methods. The article presents a model of human impact assessment on the stability of special software for computer-aided fire-explosion safety systems. The model is based on the methods of system analysis and object-oriented programming.
Results. A mathematical model of human impact assessment on the stability of special software for computer-aided fire-explosion safety systems is developed. This model allows us to obtain a formula for quantitative evaluation of the function of human influence on special software in its synthesis.
Discussion. The article shows that the reduction of human (programmer) influence on the stability of special software of computer-aided fire and explosion safety systems lies in the plane of increasing the number of reusable elements—the basic elements of programs for the synthesis of single software systems. The reduction of influence is also achieved if such elements are created separately from the synthesis of single software systems on a particular tool.
Conclusions. The results obtained by the authors can be used to assess the impact of human (programmer) on the stability of special software for computer-aided fire-explosion safety systems of oil refineries. In the synthesis of single software systems it is necessary to repeatedly use the basic elements of the programs. At the same time, the human impact on the stability in the synthesis of new versions of special software for computer-aided fire-explosion safety systems will be significantly lower.
About the Authors
N. G. Topolskiy
State Fire Academy of Emercom of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Honoured Science Worker of Russian Federation, Professor of Department of Information Technology.
Borisa Galushkina St., 4, Moscow, 129366
A. V. Kryuchkov
Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (National Research University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Assistant Professor of Department of Complex Security of Critical Objects.
Leninskiy Avenue, 65, Bldg. 1, Moscow, 119991
K. A. Mikhaylov
State Fire Academy of Emercom of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate Student of Faculty of Scientific and Pedagogical Staff, Department of Information Technology.
Borisa Galushkina St., 4, Moscow, 129366
Tuan Anh Nguyen
Institute of Fire Safety, Ministry of Public Security
Viet Nam
Viet Nam
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Head of Faculty.
Huat Zui Tiena St., 243, Hanoi, 100000
References
1. TopolskiyN. G. Osnovy avtomatizirovannykh sistem pozharovzryvobezopasnosti obyektov [Basics of computer-aided fire and explosion safety systems]. Moscow, Fire Safety Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ., 1997. 164 p. (in Russian).
2. Abrosimov A. A., TopolskiyN. G., Fedorov A. V. Avtomatizirovannyye sistemy pozharovzryvobezopasnosti neftepererabatyvayushchikh proizvodstv [Computer-aided fire and explosion safety systems of petroleum refineries]. Moscow, State Fire Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ., 1999. 239 p. (in Russian).
3. Kruchkov A. V. Summarizing the experience of synthesis special software for different programming languages. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti / Technology of Technosphere Safety, 2015, issue 3(61), pp. 252-263 (in Russian). Available at: http://agps-2006.narod.ru/ttb/2015-3/41-03-15.ttb.pdf (Accessed 3 June 2018).
4. Kruchkov A. V. Recommendations for use of synthesis methods of special software of large automated control systems of enterprise. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti / Technology of Technosphere Safety, 2015, issue 5(63), pp. 259-264 (in Russian). Available at: http://agps-2006.narod.ru/ttb/2015-5/19-05-15.ttb.pdf (Accessed 3 June 2018).
5. Kruchkov A. V. Universal application synthesis methodology of special software for large automated enterprise control system. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti / Technology of Technosphere Safety, 2015, issue 3(61), pp. 264-268 (in Russian). Available at: http://agps-2006.narod.ru/ttb/2015-3/40-03-15.ttb.pdf (Accessed 3 June 2018).
6. Dijkstra E. W., Beaulieu L., Hoare C. A. R., Dahl O.-J. Programming languages. London, 1968 (Russ. ed.: Dijkstra E. W., Beaulieu L., Hoare C. A. R., Dahl O.-J. Yazyki programmirovaniya. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1972. 410 p.).
7. ISO/IEC TR 15504:1998. Information Technology—Software Process Assessments. Parts 1-9. Geneva, International Organization for Standardization, 1998 (Russ. ed. ISO/IEC TR 15504-CMM. Otsenka i attestatsiya zrelosti protsessov sozdaniya i soprovozhdeniya programmnykh sredstv i informatsion-nykh system. Moscow, Kniga i biznes Publ., 2001. 348 p.).
8. Paulk M. C., Curtis B., ChrissisM. B., Weber C.V. Capability maturity model for software, Version 1.1. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Software Engineering Institute, 1993. 83 p. DOI: 10.21236/ada263403.
9. O’Regan G. Capability maturity model integration. In: Introduction to Software Process Improvement. Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science. London, Springer, 2011, pp. 43-65. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-172-1_3.
10. Blaschek G. Object-oriented programming. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 1994. 335 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-78077-6.
11. Sherrell L. Object-oriented (OO) programming. In: Runehov A. L. C., Oviedo L. (eds). Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions. Dordrecht, Springer, 2013, pp. 1544-1548. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_200283.
12. UmrikhinYu. D. Optimizatsiya slozhnykh informatsionnykh system [Optimization of complex information systems]. Moscow, Minradioprom SSSR Publ., 1983. 125 p. (in Russian).
13. Klimenko I. S. Teoriya sistem i sistemnyy analiz [Systems theory and system analysis]. Moscow, Russian New University Publ., 2014. 264 p. (in Russian).
14. Shikhanovich Yu. A. Vvedeniye v sovremennuyu matematiku. Nachalnyyeponyatiya [Introduction to modern mathematics. Initial concepts]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1965. 376 p. (in Russian).
15. McConnell S. Professional software development: shorter schedules, higher quality products, more successful projects, enhanced careers. Addison-Wesley, 2004.243 p. (Russ. ed.: McConnell S. Profes-sionalnaya razrabotka programmnogo obespecheniya: sokrashcheniye srokov, povysheniye kachestva produkta, bolshe udachnykh proyektov, rasshireniye vozmozhnostey uspeshnoy karyery. Saint Petersburg, Simvol&Plyus Publ., 2006. 240 p.).
16. Vendrov A. M. Proyektirovaniyeprogrammnogo obespecheniya ekonomicheskikh informatsionnykh sistem [The software design of economic information systems]. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 2006. 545 p. (in Russian).
17. Bass L., Clements P., Kazman R. Software architecture in practice. 3rd Edition. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2013. 640 p.
18. Rozanski N., Woods E. Software systems architecture: working with stakeholders using viewpoints and perspectives. 2nd Edition. Addison-Wesley, 2012. 678 p.
19. Kruchkov A. V. Assessment of laboriousness universalization methods of synthesis of the special software by COMOCOMO estimation methods. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti / Technology of Technosphere Safety, 2015, issue 4(62), pp. 282-286 (in Russian). Available at: http://agps-2006.na-rod.ru/ttb/2015-4/43-04-15.ttb.pdf (Accessed 3 June 2018).
20. Almeida J. B., Frade M. J., Pinto J. S., Melo de Sousa S. Rigorous Software Development. An introduction to program verification. London, Springer-Verlag, 2011.263 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-018-2.
21. Crookshanks E. Practical software development techniques. Berkeley, Apress, 2014. 189 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4842-0728-4.
22. Liu B. Theory and practice ofuncertain programming. Heidelberg, Physica-Verlag, 2002. 388 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-1781-2 (Russ. ed.: LiuB. Teoriya i praktika neopredelennogo programmirova-niya. Moscow, Binom Publ., 2005. 416 p.).
23. Gudin S., Khabibulin R., Shikhalev D. Searching the optimal combination of fire risks reducing measures at oil and gas processing facilities with the use of genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (Porto, Portugal, February 24-26,2017), 2017, vol. 2, pp. 489-496. DOI: 10.5220/0006188904890496.
24. Kramer O. Genetic algorithms. In: Genetic Algorithm Essentials. Studies in Computational Intelligence. Cham, Springer, 2017, vol 679, pp. 11-19. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52156-5_2.
Review
For citations:
Topolskiy N.G., Kryuchkov A.V., Mikhaylov K.A., Nguyen T. Model for assessing the human influence on the sustainability of the special software of the computer-aided fire-explosion safety systems. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2018;27(7-8):53-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18322/pvb.2018.27.7-8.53-59
Views:
504
Email this article 