Integration of quality management methods for solving product safety management tasks

Introduction. Product quality monitoring is an important task today, because it is impossible to guarantee the production of competitive products and to ensure a given level of safety. Nowadays there are no studies analyzing such a monitoring system or assessing its compliance, adequacy, and adaptability to specific production tasks.

Goals and objectives. The aim is to standardize the quality management methods monitoring system to improve the effectiveness of intelligent decision support in organizational systems. This can be achieved by integrating quality management methods and assessing the validity of the product quality monitoring system.

Methods. Analysis of the practical use of quality management methods, mathematical modelling of several quality management methods competing for the same management resources, and feasibility evaluation and examples of integration techniques to solve the problem of transferring information from one method to another.

Conclusions. Modern product quality monitoring systems have to meet the requirements of consistency, such as integrity, emergence, adaptability, accessibility, and other factors. Otherwise, the use of methods and specialized software would not improve product quality, ensure its competitiveness and compliance with safety requirements.

1. Frolova E., Gazizulina A., Eskina E., Ostarenko M., Aidarov D. Development of QFD Methodology. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. 2018; 121-128. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5577-5_10. EDN FVRQOS.

2. Fazeli H.R., Peng Q. Integrated approaches of BWM-QFD and FUCOM-QFD for improving weighting solution of design matrix. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2023; 34(3):1003-1020. DOI: 10.1007/s10845-021-01832-w. EDN NBIMGE.

3. Tian Z.P., Nie R.X., Wang J.Q., Li L. Group multigranular linguistic QFD for prioritizing service designs with combined weighting method. Expert Systems. 2019; 36(4):e12419. DOI: 10.1111/exsy.12419. EDN ONXTFO.

4. Hartanti L.P.S., Mulyono Ju., Mayang V. Penerapan FMEA dan fuzzy FMEA dalam penilaian Risiko lean waste di industri manufaktur. JST (Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi). 2022; 11(2):293-304. DOI: 10.23887/jstundiksha.v11i2.50552. EDN BAXEXJ.

5. Ivančan J., Lisjac D. New FMEA Risks Ranking Approach Utilizing Four Fuzzy Logic Systems. Machines. 2021; 9(11):292. DOI: 10.3390/machines9110292. EDN WZTXBN.

6. Klochkov Yu., Samorukov D., Samorukov V. Quality management models and methods improvement for an expanding competitive range of leather and footwear products. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences. 2024; 6(2):629-636. DOI: 10.24874/pes06.02.019. EDN GNSWRI.

7. Liu Q., Chen X., Tang X. Spherical fuzzy bipartite graph based QFD methodology (SFBG-QFD): Assistive products design application. Expert Systems with Applications. 2024; 239:122279. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122279

8. García Aguirre P.A., Pérez-Domínguez L., Luviano-Cruz D. PFDA-FMEA, an Integrated Method Improving FMEA Assessment in Product Design. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). 2021; 11(4):1406. DOI: 10.3390/app11041406. EDN BTJMSK.

9. Frizziero L., Donnici G., Galiè G., Pala G., Pilla M., Zamagna E. QFD and SDE Methods Applied to Autonomous Minibus Redesign and an Innovative Mobile Charging System (MBS). Inventions. 2023; 8(1):1. DOI: 10.3390/inventions8010001. EDN LSPSFG.

10. Sivasankaran P. Literature Review on Quality Concepts in Industrial Systems using QFD (Quality Function Deployment) — Survey and Extensions. Productivity. 2021; 61(4):463-469. DOI: 10.32381/prod.2021.61.04.9. EDN EPWLGV.

11. Zhou X., Chen Ch., Tian H., Wang L., Yang Zh., Yang H. Time-varying FMEA method based on interval-valued spherical fuzzy theory. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 2021; 37(8):3713-3729. DOI: 10.1002/qre.2943. EDN RYAVZQ.

12. Wang W.A., Ma Y., Liu Sh. Z-number integrated weighted MULTIMOORA method for risk prioritization in FMEA. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. 2021; 41(2):2523-2537. DOI: 10.3233/jifs-200678. EDN ITUQBS.

13. Abdusalomov A.G.U. Applications of PME analysis in metallurgical plants. Quality and life. 2025; 1(45):54-60. EDN DLMREW. (rus).

14. Danielyan A.S., Khunuzidi E.I. QFD Metod: from Industry 3.0 to Industrii 4.0. Part 2. Production quality control. 2025; 4:62-64. EDN KHMJEJ. (rus).

15. Kastorskaya L.V., Rozno M.I., Chuklina E.V. FMEA Method: Warnings to Heed. Methods of Quality Management. 2025; 7:40-41. EDN PRHPNO. (rus).

16. Klochkov Yu.S., Koval N.O. Development of the quality function deployment method at the product design stage. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Science. 2024; 26(4-3):(120):428-436. DOI: 10.37313/1990-5378-2024-26-4(3)-428-436. EDN OJMXWB. (rus).

17. Kozminykh M.Yu., Klochkov Yu.S. Risk management model for the development of hazardous man-made processes in the activities of high-tech industries based on the results of control supervisory activities. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Science. 2024; 26:1(117):33-45. DOI: 10.37313/1990-5378-2024-26-1-33-45. EDN JGISSY. (rus).

18. Plotinskiy Yu.M. Problems of Development of the Knowledge Society: A Sociocognitive Approach. Information society. 2008; 5-6:43-50. EDN KVMXNF. (rus).

19. Kholboeva U.Sh., Ostapenko M.S. Automation system for constructing a “house of quality” during QFD analysis : Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference named after D.I. Mendeleyev, dedicated to the 15th anniversary of the Institute of Industrial Technology and Engineering. Tyumen, TIU, 2024; 282-284. EDN NEPDMV.

20. Ostapenko M.S., Kholboeva U.Sh., Tveryakov A.M. Developing an online application for automating “house of quality” construction for QFD analysis. Architecture, construction, transport. 2024; 4(110):114-124. DOI: 10.31660/2782-232X-2024-4-114-123. EDN TAWVJQ. (rus).