Rational allocation of the resource designated for comprehensive safety assurance at an enterprise: the problem statement

Introduction. Corporate resources translate into a strong in-house capacity that ensures sustainable production processes. We present a novel integrated area of activity, whose purpose is to solve problems by identifying the factors of influence, coming from employees of versatile departments (structural units) and focused on industryspecific (sectoral) functions that are part of the comprehensive safety system of an enterprise.
Methods of research. The author employed the established methods of comprehensive safety assurance to analyze a number of approaches. He also explored the features of their application. The author also substantiated the choice of the Lagrange multiplier method, used to formulate the problem of rational allocation of the resource designated for the sustainable performance of functions that assure the comprehensive safety of an enterprise.
Problem statement. The author addresses the problem of rational allocation of the resource (the labor potential), considered as a factor of influence produced on the sustainable performance of industry-specific (sectoral) functions that comprise the system of comprehensive safety of an enterprise.
An exemplary solution. The author offers an example that represents a description of the process of consecutive identification of critical points that are relevant to the impact (a coefficient) produced by the personnel on the sustainable performance of industry-specific (sectoral) functions that contribute to the comprehensive safety of an enterprise.
Conclusions. Solutions for specific tasks, forming part of a methodologically described problem, will make it possible to develop a methodology for the synthesis of the comprehensive safety which is adaptable to different conditions of operation of an enterprise (day-to-day operations, as well as threats and emergencies of natural and man-induced origin), and each is of great economic importance for Russia.

1. Gvozdev E.V., Matvienko Yu.G. Comprehensive risk assessment at the life support enterprises with hazardous production facilities. Occupational Safety in Industry. 2019; 10:69-78. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-10-69-78 (rus).

2. Gvozdev E.V., Sulima T.G. Assessing the risk of hazards in the technosphere: A case study of a regional essential service provider. Civil Security Technology. 2019; 16:4(62):50-56. URL: https://www.vniigochs.ru/storage/photos/4/TGB_articles/2019/N4_2019/Assessing%20the%20Risk%20of%20Hazards%20in%20the%20Technosphere_tgb_4_2019_p8.pdf (rus).

3. Raizberg B.A., Lozovsky L.Sh., Starodubtseva E.B. Modern economic dictionary. 6th ed., revised and enlarged. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2011; 512. (rus).

4. Gvozdev E.V., Matvienko Yu.G. To ensure comprehensive safety of enterprises with hazardous production facilities. Safety and Emergencies problems. 2020; 2:72-81. DOI: 10.36535/0869-4176-2020-02-9

5. Dolgov A.I. Preparation and examination of dissertations : monograph. Rostov, Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, 1993; 216. (rus).

6. Gvozdev E.V., Gribanova E.B., Matvienko Yu.G. Methodology for analysis of the indicators of the human factor effect on the integrated safety and security of electric power enterprises. OccupationalSafety in Industry. 2020; 12:38-43. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-12-38-43 (rus).

7. Makhutov N.A., Matvienko Yu.G., Romanov A.N. Problems of strength, technogenic safety andstructural materials science : monograph. Moscow, URSS, 2018; 720. (rus).

8. Gorecky D., Schmitt M., Loskyll M., Zühlke D. Human-machine-interaction in the industry 4.0 era. 2014 12th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN). IEEE, 2014. DOI: 10.1109/INDIN.2014.6945523

9. Bolgov S.V. Synthesis of design solutions with an increased level of safety of functioning in CAD of construction objects : dissertation of the Candidate of Technical Sciences. Moscow, 2005; 141. (rus).

10. Trueba-Alonso P., Corrales-Quirós C., Méndez-Salguero J., Rejas-López L. Evolution of plant operation in main control rooms of nuclear power plants as a consequence of modernization programs. 11th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies, NPIC andHMIT 2019. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1541931215591056

11. Security of Russia. Legal, socio-economic, scientific and technical aspects. Technogenic, technological and technosphere safety ; N.A. Makhutova (ed.). Moscow, Znanie Publ., 2018; 1016. (rus).

12. McDermott P.L., Ries A.J., Plott B., Touryan J., Barnes M., Schweitzer K. A cognitive systems engineering evaluation of a tool to aid imagery analysts. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2015; 59(1):274-278. DOI: 10.1177/1541931215591056

13. Makhutov N.A., Gadenin M.M., Buinovsky S.N., Grazhdankin A.I. Scientific fundamentals of industrial safety in the multivolume series “Safety of Russia. Legal, Socio-Economic and Scientific-Technical Aspects”. Occupational Safety in Industry. 2020; 4:17-26. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-4-17-26. (rus).

14. Donham K.J., Thelin A., Donham K.J., Thelin A. General environmental hazards in agriculture communities. Agricultural Medicine. 2016; 251-291. DOI: 10.1002/9781118647356.ch7

15. Shcherbina V.I., Lyubimov M.M. The concept of the system of national standards for security systems of buildings and structures. Safety in construction. 2008; 1:16-24. (rus).

16. Stock T., Obenaus M., Kunz S., Kohl H. Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2018; 118:254-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.026

17. Security of Russia. Legal, socio-economic, scientific and technical aspects. Fundamental and appliedproblems of complex ; N.A. Makhutova (ed.). Moscow, Znanie Publ., 2017; 992. (rus).

18. Blyumin S.L., Sukhanov V.F., Chebotarev S.V. Economic factor analysis : monograph. Lipetsk, LEGI Publ., 2004; 148. (rus).

19. Curea Ş.C., Ciora C. The impact of human capital on economic growth. Quality –– Access to Success. 2013.

20. Bojita A., Purcar M., Boianceanu C., Topa V. Efficient computational methodology of thermo-mechanical phenomena in the metal system of power ICs. 2019 25th International Workshop on ThermalInvestigations of ICs and Systems (THERMINIC). 2019. DOI: 10.1109/THERMINIC.2019.8923502

21. Reynolds W.C., Colonna P. The method of Lagrange multipliers // Thermodynamics. 2019; 392-393. DOI: 10.1017/9781139050616.017

22. Upreti S.R. Lagrange multipliers. Optimal Control for Chemical Engineers. CRC Press, 2016; 87-121. DOI: 10.1201/b13045-4

23. Zhao S., Song J., Ermon S. The information autoencoding family: A lagrangian perspective on latent variable generative models. 34th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2018, UAI 2018. 2018.

24. Gvozdev E.V. Methodology for the synthesis of an adaptive integrated security system at a regional life support enterprise. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2020; 29(2):6-16. DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2020.29.04.15-31 (rus).

25. Gvozdev E.V. Methodology of dynamic factor influence of services on security subsystems that ensure comprehensive security of enterprises. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2020; 29(4):15-31. DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2020.29.04.15-31 (rus).