Fire and explosion safety management at fuel and energy facilities in special conditions

Introduction. The decision-makers (DM) are bear responsibility for fire safety (FS) at the fuel and energy complex (FEC) facilities. There is the fact of the impact of production intensification and data volume growth on the intensity of the load on the human resources. Which in turn increases the probability of errors of the DM. Automation and the use of information technologies allow us to optimize production processes. However, the level of responsibility of the DM is not reduced. In addition, it is noted that the reserve of time for decision making at the FEC facilities is being reduced. The objective of scientific research is to substantiate the relevance and necessity of using strategic planning methods in improving the planning of fire and explosion safety (FES) activities at the FEC facilities in special conditions.

Theoretical bases. Such concepts as strategy, aggregate goal, planning horizon, target function, and non-formalized information are analyzed. The necessity of creating a tree of plans for the DM in order to conduct and control actions over the management object is justified. There is described the relationship between an aggregate goal and a strategy consisting of a sequence of actions by the DM to achieve certain values of aggregate quality indicator.

Research results. This part of article justifies the necessity of applying strategic planning methods in order to preserve the performance indicators for DM at FEC facilities in the direction ofFES in changing special conditions. The characteristics of these conditions and the reasons for their occurrence are presented. In the absence of necessary planning and management methods in such conditions, the acceptable response time to a change in the environment will be exceeded. In order to overcome the tendency to reduce the efficiency of DM at FEC facilities in special conditions, it is proposed to use the software-hardware complex of the information and analytical system for strategic planning ofFES activities.

Conclusion. Finally, it was noted the relationship between the number of errors of DM in the decision making process for subsystems of theFES and the increase in the volume of information from the means of accumulation and transmission data. It is really important to adapt theFES subsystems to the new special conditions with the use suggested information and analytical system for strategic planning.

1. S. M. Dawoud. Fire protection in the petroleum industry. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (November 11–14,2007, Anaheim, California, USA). DOI: 10.2118/110521-ms.

2. R. M. Tagiev. Modern technologies of fire protection on guard of objects of ACS “Gazprom”. Gazovaya promyshlennost’ / Gas Industry, 2014, no. S(712), pp. 70–73 (in Russian).

3. I. A. Kapitonov, V. I. Voloshin, I. V. Zhukovskaya, A. A. Shulus. Small and medium-sized enterprises as a driver of innovative development of the Russian fuel and energy complex. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2017, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 231–239.

4. Prakash J. Digital twins define oil & gas 4.0. Available at: https://www.arcweb.com/blog/digital-twins-define-oil-gas-40 (Accessed February 21, 2020).

5. S. Vaidya, P. Ambad, S. Bhosle. Industry 4.0 — A glimpse. Procedia Manufacturing, 2018, vol. 20, pp. 233–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034.

6. F. Zezulka, P. Marcon, I. Vesely, O. Sajdl. Industry 4.0 — An introduction in the phenomenon. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2016, vol. 49, no. 25, pp. 8–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.002.

7. S. Yu. Golovin. Slovar prakticheskogo psikhologa [Dictionary of practical psychology]. Minsk, Harvest Publ., 2007. 976 p. (in Russian).

8. V. I. Annenkov, N. N. Barchan, A. V. Moiseev, B. I. Kiselev. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba. Osnovy organizatsii upravlencheskoy deyatelnosti. Uchebnoye posobiye [Public service. Fundamentals of management activity organization. Textbook]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Company KnoRus Publ., 2014. 254 p. (in Russian).

9. A. N. Azriliyan, O. M. Azriliyan, E. V. Kalashnikova, O. Kvardakova. Bolshoy ekonomicheskiy slovar [Big economic dictionary]. Moscow, Institut novoy ekonomiki Publ., 2012. 1472 p. (in Russian).

10. S. N. Grinyaev, D. A. Medvedev, D. I. Pravikov, I. V. Samarin, A. Yu. Sherbakov. Problems and methods of creation of ultra-large information systems (as exemplified by the data of the Federal Service for State Registration, Cadastre and Cartography). Asia Life Sciences — The Asian International Journal of Life Sciences, 2019, supp. 21, no. 1, pp. 249–260.

11. A. B. Doktorovich. The formalized description and classification of social actions, interactions and relations. Prostranstvo i vremya / Space and Time, 2011, no. 2(4), pp. 48–57 (in Russian).

12. N. N. Moiseev. Matematicheskiye zadachi sistemnogo analiza [Mathematical tasks of the system analysis]. 3rd ed. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2013. 532 p. (in Russian).

13. C. Handscomb, S. Sharabura, J. Woxholth. The oil and gas organization of the future. September 2016. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/the-oil-and-gas-organization-of-the-future (Accessed February 25, 2020).

14. R. Kovin, A. Kudinov, N. G. Markov, E. Miroshnichenko. Information technologies in industrial enterprises production assets management. Key Engineering Materials, 2016, vol. 685, pp. 823–827. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.685.823.

15. IRP 15: Snubbing Operations. An Industry Recommended Practice (IRP) for the Canadian oil and gas industry. May 2015, vol. 15. 167 p. Available at: http://www.enform.ca/resources/download-resource.cfm?resourceId=25&type=pdf (Accessed February 21, 2020).

16. Construction health and safety manual: oil refineries and petrochemical plants. Available at: https://www.ihsa.ca/rtf/health_safety_manual/pdfs/locations/OilRefineries.pdf (Accessed February 20, 2020).

17. The structure of the market of automatic fire alarms in Russia (in Russian). Available at: https://prcs.ru/analytics-article/rynok-aps-(avtomaticheskih-pozharnyh-signalizacij)/ (Accessed February 21, 2020).

18. Putin was told the figures for import substitution, which Oreshkin could not immediately recall (in Russian). Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3946545 (Accessed April 17, 2020).

19. A. Okhlopkov. Oil and gas companies have tried out import substitution. Guide “Tyumenskiy neftegazovyy forum” / Guide “Tyumen Oil and Gas Forum”, 2018, no. 169, pp. 14–15 (in Russian). Available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3743355 (Accessed February 7, 2020).

20. I. V. Samarin, A. Yu. Strogonov. Model of evaluation of fire safety at fuel and energy complex facilities using temporal characteristics from graphs of strategic planning using automated control system. Trudy Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta nefti i gaza imeni I. M. Gubkina / Proceedings of Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas, 2018, no. 4(293), pp. 143–154 (in Russian).

21. I. V. Samarin, A. Yu. Strogonov, S. Yu. Butuzov. Evaluation model of integrated safety of fuel and energy complex facilities. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 2019, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 2162–2167.

22. A. V. Kruchkov. Modeling possible actions user of enterprise automation management systems. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti / Technology of Technosphere Safety, 2015, no. 1(59), pp. 145–149 (in Russian).

23. A. V. Kruchkov. Summarizing the experience of synthesis special software for different programming languages. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti / Technology of Technosphere Safety, 2015, no. 3(61), pp. 252–263 (in Russian).

24. A. V. Kruchkov. Problems of standardization of software and ways of their possible solutions. Voprosy radioelektroniki / Questions of Radio Electronics, 2006, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 123–126 (in Russian).

25. A. V. Kruchkov. Universal application synthesis methodology of special software for large automated enterprise control system. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti / Technology of Technosphere Safety, 2015, no. 3(61), pp. 264–268 (in Russian).