Methodology for the synthesis of an adaptive integrated security system at a regional life support enterprise

Introduction. Solving problems related to providing high-quality services to the population of cities (water supply, energy supply, hot water supply, heating, waste disposal) is an integral part of the work of government bodies (regional entities, regions, subjects, municipalities, and their districts). These include enterprises that provide life support to the population, in the technological process of which, as a rule, sections (sites) of hazardous production facilities are involved. At such enterprises, it is proposed to create a comprehensive security system that combines all industry (departmental) security subsystems and is an integral part of their management system. The sustain­able functioning of the enterprises in question largely depends on the availability of resources (financial and material resources, time, personnel, etc.) of the integrated security system created at the enterprise, which has volume restrictions. Until now, in practice, the allocation of resources to maintain comprehensive security is based on the intuitive considerations of the company’s security managers. When this approach is implemented, the integrated security system created at the enterprise becomes vulnerable.

Method of research. Approaches using existing methods in the complex security of enterprises are analyzed, and the features of their application are considered. A joint application of the hierarchy analysis method and the “tree of events” method is proposed, which makes it possible to determine the initial initiating events, establish the fact of hazard occurrence, and make an attempt to predict the possible effects of hazards on the objects of protection of life-support enterprises of the population.

Problem statement. Complex security of enterprises providing life support to the population is characterized by conditions considered at a certain time, deviation from the parameters of which can lead to a failure in the activi­ties of a separate industry security subsystem, and in the activities of the complex technosphere security system of the enterprise as a whole. Based on information about the risk assessment in the industry security subsystems, their comparison with each other in terms of the level of impact, it is necessary to determine the list of measures taking into account their physical feasibility in the conditions of restrictions in providing the system with resources (financial and material resources, personnel).

Problem solution. The proposed approach to allow consistent, gradual assessment of the state of the complex system of technosphere safety of the company, which is based on the joint application of methods of analysis of hierarchies and the construction of “tree event” which is characterized by ease of use, clarity, dynamism, versatility and commonality.

Conclusion. The advantage of the proposed approach is the ability to observe changes in the properties of the state of industry security subsystems, which will allow you to create an expert or intelligent enterprise security management system. The use of this approach will allow us to conduct further research in improving the methodology for synthesizing the adaptive system of integrated enterprise security, which is of great economic importance forRussia.

1. E. V. Gvozdev, Yu. G. Matvienko. Comprehensive risk assessment at the life support enterprises with hazardous production facilities. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti / Occupational Safety in In-dustry, 2019, no. 10, pp. 69–78 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-10-69-78.

2. E. V. Gvozdev, S. Yu. Butuzov, T. G. Sulima, S. B. Arifjanov. Formal model of evaluating the reliabi-lity of thermal power plants. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety, 2019, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 47–56 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18322/PVB/2019.28.02.47-56.

3. E. V. Gvozdev, V. M. Cherkina. The modern strategy to the process of managing complex security of the enterprise on the basis of rational centralization. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 2019, vol. 9, issue 1, pp. 4614–4620. DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.A4944.119119.

4. Risk-based inspection. API Recommended Practice 580. 2nd ed. November 2009. 84 p. Available at: https://www.irantpm.ir/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/API-RP-580-Risk-Based-Inspection-2009.pdf (Accessed March 2, 2020).

5. Risk-Based Inspection Technology. API Recommended Practice 581. 2nd ed. September 2008. 654 p. Available at: https://www.irantpm.ir/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/API-581-2008.pdf (Accessed March 2, 2020).

6. E. J. Henley, H. Kumamoto. Reliability of engineering and risk assessment. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice- Hall, Inc., 1981 (Russ. ed.: E. J. Henley, H. Kumamoto. Bezopasnost truda v promyshlennosti. Moscow, Mashinrostroyeniye Publ., 1984. 582 p.).

7. N. A. Makhutov (ed.). Bezopasnost Rossii. Pravovyye, sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye i nauchno-tekhni-cheskiye aspekty. Nauchnyye osnovy tekhnogennoy bezopasnosti [Security of Russia. Legal, socio-economic, and scientific and technical aspects. Scientific bases of technogenic safety]. Moscow, Znaniye Publ., 2015. 935 p. (in Russian).

8. N. A. Makhutov (ed.). Bezopasnost Rossii. Pravovyye, sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye i nauchno-tekhni-cheskiye aspekty. Tekhnogennaya, tekhnologicheskaya i tekhnosfernaya bezopasnost [Security of Russia. Legal, socio-economic, and scientific and technical aspects. Man-made, technological and technosphere safety]. Moscow, Znaniye Publ., 2018. 1016 p. (in Russian).

9. N. A. Makhutov (ed.). Bezopasnost Rossii. Pravovyye, sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye i nauchno-tekhni-cheskiye aspekty. Fundamentalnyye i prikladnyye problemy kompleksnoy bezopasnosti [Security of Russia. Legal, socio-economic, and scientific and technical aspects. Fundamental and applied problems of complex security]. Moscow, Znaniye Publ., 2017. 992 p. (in Russian).

10. N. A. Makhutov (ed.). Bezopasnost Rossii. Pravovyye, sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye i nauchno-tekhni-cheskiye aspekty. Analiz riska i problem bezopasnosti [Security of Russia. Legal, socio-economic, and scientific and technical aspects. Analysis of risk and security problems]. In 4 parts. Moscow, Znaniye Publ., 2007. Part 4, 864 p. (in Russian).

11. N. A. Makhutov, Yu. G. Matvienko, A. N. Romanov. Problemy prochnosti, tekhnogennoy bezopasnosti i konstruktsionnogo materialovedeniya [Problems of strength, technogenic safety and structural materials science]. Moscow, URSS Publ., 2018. 720 p. (in Russian).

12. D. M. Gordienko. Fire safety of particularly dangerous and technically complex production facilities of the oil and gas complex. Dr. Sci. (Eng.) Diss. Moscow, 2018. 480 p. (in Russian).

13. V. V. Novikov. Development of theory and methods for creating occupational safety management systems at machine-building enterprises. Dr. Sci. (Eng.) Diss. Moscow, 2013. 429 p. (in Russian).

14. D. A. Melnikova. Theoretical and practical aspects of building an industrial safety management system at hazardous production facilities (for example, Gazprom transgaz Samara LLC). Cand. Sci. (Eng.) Diss. Samara, 2016. 120 p. (in Russian).

15. NFPA 14–2019. Standard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems. Quincy, MA, NFPA, 2019. 67 p.

16. A. Aneiba, M. Melad. Performance evaluation of AODV, DSR, OLSR, and GRP MANET routing protocols using OPNET. International Journal of Future Computer and Communication, 2016, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 57–60. DOI: 10.18178/ijfcc.2016.5.1.444.

17. R. Billinton, W. Li. Reliability assessment of electric power systems using Monte Carlo methods. Boston, MA, Springer, 1994. 351 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1346-3.

18. L. Gandossi, K. Simola, B. Shepherd. The link between risk-informed in-service inspection and inspection qualification. Insight — Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 2009, vol. 51, issue 1, pp. 16–20. DOI: 10.1784/insi.2009.51.1.16.

19. A. B. Shitov. Development of numerical methods and programs related to the use of wavelet analysis for modeling and processing experimental data. Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.) Diss. Moscow, 2001. 125 p. (in Russian).

20. IAEA-TECDOC-1400. Improvement of in-service inspection in nuclear power plants. Vienna, Austria, IAEA, 2004. 35 p.

21. Saati T. Decision Making. Method for analyzing hierarchies. URL: https://pqm-online.com/assets/files/lib/books/saaty.pdf (Аccessed 05.01.2020).

22. V. A. Gorev. Nadezhnost tekhnicheskikh sistem i tekhnogennyy risk [Reliability of technical systems and technogenic risk]. Moscow, MISI–MGSU Publishing House, 2018. 120 p. (in Russian).