About efficiency of application of fire-prevention doors in reduction of dangerous factors of the fire and size of fire risk in buildings and constructions of various functional purpose

Introduction. At the moment, the provisions of regulatory documents governing fire risk calculations need up­dating and clarification in narrowly focused problem issues.
Methods. The existing regulatory framework is presented for the most part by the departmental order of Emercom of Russia. With the development of fire-fighting and fire-fighting technologies, as well as computational methods capable of simulating this or that emergency situation, the possibility of substantiating various fire development scenarios has expanded. Experiments on calculations for objects of various functional purposes, issued by leading scientific organizations of our country, as well as specialists involved in fire risk calculations, have shown the re­levance and the need for changes and clarifications in the regulatory framework governing these ­types of work. At the same time, it should be noted that the above-mentioned departmental norms and recommendations, ­despite their practical significance, do not reflect the issue of using fire doors for practical purposes and cannot serve the tasks that modernity sets for itself.
Results and discussion. Due to the existing problems of design and state examination, commissioning of construction supervision bodies and supervision of objects already operated by state fire supervision authorities Emercom of Russia, is almost universally preceded by the development of fire risk calculations in order to confirm fire protection objects. The peculiarity of such calculations is, first of all, the need to present those to a specific capital construction object, while in some cases even the presence of all the fire protection systems of a building does not en­sure people’s safety due to various reasons. The main one of which is the rapid blocking of evacuation routes by fire and resulting in death of people.
Conclusions. The use of fire doors in the calculations of fire risk, which are used more than once at various protec­tion facilities and confirmed their effectiveness at the implemented facilities, seems appropriate to reflect in the relevant regulatory documents, which will greatly improve the actual safety of people.

1. On fire safety. Federal Law of the Russian Federation on 21 December 1994 No. 69-FZ (ed. on 28 May 2017) (in Russian). Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW 5438/ (Accessed 15 March 2019).

2. Technical regulations for fire safety requirements. Federal Law of the Russian Federation on 22 July 2008 No. 123-FZ (ed. on 29 July 2017) (in Russian). Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/ 902111644 (Accessed 15 January 2019).

3. Methodology for fire risk determining in buildings and structures of different fire danger. Order of Emercom of Russian Federation on 30 June 2009 No. 382 (ed. on 2 December 2015) (in Russian). Available at: http://base.garant.ru/12169057/ (Accessed 10 December 2018).

4. On amendments to the Order of Emercom of Russia on 30 June 2009 No. 382. Order of Emercom of -Russia on 2 December 2015 No. 632 (in Russian). Available at: http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/ 71296390/paragraph/1:0 (Accessed 10 March 2019).

5. V. V. Kholshchevnikov, D. A. Samoshin, A. P. Parfenenko, I. S. Kudrin, R. N. Istratov, I. R. Beloso-khov. Evakuatsiya i povedeniye lyudey pri pozharakh [Evacuation and behavior of people during fires]. Moscow, State Fire Academy of Emercom of Russia Publ., 2015. 262 p. (in Russian).

6. V. V. Kholshchevnikov, D. A. Samoshin. Evakuatsiya i povedeniye lyudey pri pozharakh [Evacuation and behavior of people during fires]. Moscow, State Fire Academy of Emercom of Russia Publ., 2009. 212 p. (in Russian).

7. Z. S.-A. Aybuev, I. I. Isaevich, M. V. Medyanik. Free movement of people in a stream and problems of individual and line modeling. Poћarovzryvobezopasnost’ Fire and Explosion Safety, 2015, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 66–73 (in Russian).

8. V. L. Karpov, M. V. Medyanik. About the necessity of realization of process of preventive rescue of -people during the fire in a unique high-rise buildings. Poћarovzryvobezopasnost’ Fire and Explosion Safety, 2017, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 25–30 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2017.26.08.25-30.

9. E. D. Kuligowski, R. D. Peacock. A review of building evacuation models. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Technical Note 1471. Washington, U. S. Department of Commerce, 2005. 156 p. Available at: http s://ws680.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=902501 (Accessed 20 March 2019).

10. Guan Heng Yeoh, Kwok Kit Yuen (eds.). Computational fluid dynamics in fire engineering: theory, modelling and practice. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2009,544 p. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-7506- 8589-4.X0001-4.

11. Hermes — Investigation of an evacuation assistant for use in emergencies during large-scale public events. Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS), 2011. Available at: https://www.fz-juelich.de/ias/ jsc/EN/Research/ModellingSimulation/CivilSec urityTraffic/Projects/Hermes/_node.html (Accessed 25 March 2019).

12. A. Schadschneider, W. Klingsch, H. Klьpfel, T. Kretz, C. Rogsch, A. Seyfried. Evacuation dynamics: empirical results, modeling and applications. In: R. Meyers (ed.). Encyclopedia of Complexity and -System Science. New York, Springer, 2009, pp. 3142–3176. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_187.

13. H. Frantzich, D. Nilsson. Evacuation experiments in a smoke filled tunnel. In: Proceedings of Third -International Symposium on Human Behaviour in Fire. Belfast, United Kingdom, 1–3 September, 2004, pp. 229–238.

14. A. J. Grandison, E. R. Galea, M. K. Patel. Fire modelling standards/benchmark Report on Phase 1 Simulations. Available at: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/39470611/fire-modelling- standards-benchmark-report-on-phase-1- (Accessed 25 March 2019).

15. K. Kang. A smoke model and its application for smoke management in an underground mass transit station. Fire Safety Journal, 2007, vol. 42, issue 3, pp. 218–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2006.10.003.

16. D. M. Hanea. Human risk of fire: Building a decision support tool using Bayesian networks. Netherlands, Wцhrmann Print Service, 2009. 227 p. Available at: file://F:Fire%20Journal201904’%202019/ Work%2004’2019Hanea_PhDThesis.pdf (Accessed 25 March 2019).

17. V. Kholshchevnikov, D. Korolchenko, O. Zosimova. Efficiency evaluation criteria of communication paths structure in a complex of buildings of maternity and child-care institutions. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2017, vol. 106, article no. 01037. 11 p. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201710601037.

18. M. Medyanik, O. Zosimova. Key problems of fire safety enforcement in traffic and communication -centers (TCC). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2017, vol. 90, article no. 012151. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/90/1/012151.

19. A. M. Ryzhov, I. R. Khasanov, A. V. Karpov, A. V. Volkov, V. V. Litskevich, A. A. Dekterev. Primeneniye polevogo metoda matematicheskogo modelirovaniya pozharov v pomeshcheniyakh [Application of the field method of mathematical modeling of fires in rooms]. Moscow, VNIIPO Publ., 2003. 46 p. (in Russian).

20. D. S. Serebrennikov, K. Yu. Litvintsev. Overview of smoke propagation models and modeling smoke visibility. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti Technology of Technosphere Safety, 2011, no. 1(35), 6 p. (in Russian). Available at: http://agps-2006.narod.ru/ttb/2011-1/06-01-11.ttb.pdf (Accessed 25 March 2019).

21. A. A. Abashkin, A. V. Karpov, D. V. Ushakov, M. V. Fomin, A. N. Giletich, P. M. Komkov, D. A. Samoshin. Posobiye po primeneniyu Metodiki opredeleniya raschetnykh velichin pozharnogo riska v zdaniyakh, sooruzheniyakh i stroyeniyakh razlichnykh klassov funktsionalnoy pozharnoy opasnosti [Handbook on the application of “Methods for determining the calculated values of fire risk in build-ings, structures and structures of various classes of functional fire hazard]. 2nd ed. Moscow, VNIIPO Publ., 2014. 226 p. (in Russian).