Preview

Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety

Advanced search

Modeling the level of risk of decisions accepted at management fire elimination

https://doi.org/10.18322/PVB.2019.28.03.36-49

Abstract

Introduction. Systems of decision-making support, which are applied when managing fire-extinguishing operations, allow reducing direct financial damage and number of dead and wounded. The work in question is devoted to the construction of the risk model based on the decisions taken by the Fire Ground Commander (FGC) being the Decision Maker (DM) in the context of extinguishing the fire in a multi-storey building.

Aims and problems. The objective of the research is the construction of a model that would demonstrate the risk level contained in the decisions of the FGC. In order to achieve the objective it is necessary to solve the following problems: 1) to choose the type of a decision taking model; 2) to build the algorithm of model parameter estimation using the decisions taken by the FGC; 3) to analyze the model's quality.

Methods. The model class called Nature Games has been chosen. The procedure of DM's decision taking process observed while extinguishing the fire in a multi-storey building has been presented as a three-level decision tree. It was transformed into a normal (table) form, thus presenting the decision choice as the Hurwitz Criterion. Hurwitz's parameter of pessimism/optimism demonstrates the risk level contained in the DM's decisions. Simulation modelling has been performed in ordertocheckthe working capacity of the suggested Hurwitz parameter estimation technology.

Results and discussion. Simulation experiments proved the working capacity of the suggested technology on assessingthe DM'sdegreeof risk proneness. The estimates that have been built for different DM allow comparing the risk proneness degree of different FGCs. It provides a possibility to build model estimates based on the decisions taken by the experienced FGC. Estimates of other FGCs thus could be compared with the model ones, drawing conclusions on their management quality.

Conclusion. The objective of the research has been achieved due to solving the set problems. The suggested technology is a high-potential type of machine education that can be used both as a part of the DM's decision taking support systems and when training personnel whose role involves emergency operation control.

About the Author

V. Ya. Vilisov
Technological University
Russian Federation

Valeriy Ya. VILISOV, Dr. Sci. (Econom.), Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Professor of Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

Researcher ID: P-1650-2019

Gagarina St., 42, Korolyev, Moscow Region, 141070

 



References

1. N. N. Brushlinskiy, S. V. Sokolov. Matematicheskiye metody i modeli upravleniya v GPS i RSChS [Mathematical methods and control models in State Fire Service and Russian System of Prevention and Response to Emergencies]. Moscow, State Fire Academy of Emercom of Russia Publ., 2011. 250 p. (in Russian).

2. V. L. Semikov. Complex researches of security problems. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti / Technology of Technosphere Safety, 2015, issue 5(63), pp. 235-242 (in Russian). Available at: http://agps-2006.narod.ru/ttb/2015-5/31-05-15.ttb.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2019).

3. N. N. Brushlinsky, E. A. Klepko, S. Yu. Popkov, S. V. Sokolov. Fire safety management of subjects of the Russian Federation on the basis of fire hazard analysis. Problemy bezopasnosti i chrezvychaynykh situatsiy / Safety and Emergencies Problems, 2010, no. 3, pp. 104-114 (in Russian).

4. Ya. S. Povzik. Pozharnaya taktika [Fire tactic]. Moscow, ZAO “Spetstekhnika” Publ., 2004. 416 p. (in Russian).

5. N. N. Brushlinskiy, Yu. N. Shebeko (eds). Pozharnyye riski: dinamika, upravleniye, prognozirovaniye [Fire risks: dynamics, management, forecasting]. Moscow, VNIIPO Publ., 2007. 370 p. (in Russian).

6. I. M. Teterin, N. G. Topolskiy, V. M. Klimovtsov, Yu. V. Prus. Application of mathematical theory of games in system of support of decision-making. Tekhnologii tekhnosfernoy bezopasnosti / Technology of Technosphere Safety, 2008, issue 6(22), 21 p. (in Russian). Available at: http://agps-2006.na- rod.ru/ttb/2008-6/09-06-08.ttb.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2019).

7. C. Macqueron. Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of a wood-burning stove-heated sauna using NIST’s Fire Dynamics Simulator. 2009. 9 p. Available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1404/1404.6774.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2019).

8. B. Steffen, A. Seyfried. Modelling of pedestrian movement around 90° and 180° bends. In: Conference at Advanced Research Workshop on Fire Protection and Life Safety in Buildings and Transportation Systems (15-17 October 2009, Santander). 11 p. Available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.0610.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2019).

9. R. Stroh, J. Bect, S. Demeyer, N. Fischer, E. Vazquez. Gaussian process modeling for stochastic multifidelity simulators, with application to fire safety. 2016. 6 p. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.02561.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2019).

10. E. E. Hamke, R. Jordan, M. Ramon-Martinez. Breath activity detection algorithm. 2016. 11 p. Available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1602/1602.07767.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2019).

11. J. Ribeiro, J. E. Almeida, R. J. F. Rossetti, A. Coelho, A. L. Coelho. Using serious games to train evacuation behaviour. 2013. 6 p. Available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1303/1303.3828.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2019).

12. K. Yun, J. Bustos, T. Lu. Predicting rapidfire growth (flashover) using conditional generative adversarial networks. 2018. 4 p. Available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1801/1801.09804.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2019).

13. J. Zhang, A. Seyfried. Empirical characteristics of different types ofpedestrian streams. 2012. 8 p. Available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1207/1207.5931.pdf (Accessed 28 March 2019).

14. V. V. Bomas, V. A. Sudakov. Podderzhka subyektivnykh resheniy v mnogakriterialnykh zadachakh [Supportforsubjectivedecisionsinmulti-criteria tasks]. Moscow, MAI Publ., 2011.176p. (inRussian).

15. L. G. Labsker. Teoriya kriteriyev optimalnosti i ekonomicheskiye resheniya [The theory of optimality criteria and economic decisions]. Moscow, Knorus Publ., 2009. 744 p. (in Russian).

16. D. A. Novikov. Hierarchical models of hostilities combat. Upravlenie bol’simi sistemami /Large-Scale Systems Control, 2012, issue 37, pp. 25-62 (in Russian).

17. V. Ya. Vilisov. Adaptivnyy vybor upravlencheskikh resheniy. Modeli issledovaniya operatsiy kak sred- stvo khraneniya znaniy LPR [Adaptive choice of management decisions. Models of operations research as a means of storing knowledge of decision makers]. Saarbryuken, Germany, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2011. 376 p. (in Russian).

18. A. B. Petrovskiy. Teoriya prinyatiya resheniy [Decision theory]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 2009. 400 p. (in Russian).

19. D. M. Gordienko (gen. ed.). Pozhary i pozharnaya bezopasnost v 2016 godu. Statisticheskiy sbornik [Fires and fire safety in 2016. Statistical yearbook]. Moscow, VNIIPO Publ.,2017.124p. (inRussian).

20. H. A. Taha. Operations research: an introduction. 10th global ed. Harlow, England, Pearson Education Limited, 2016. 848 p.


Review

For citations:


Vilisov V.Ya. Modeling the level of risk of decisions accepted at management fire elimination. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2019;28(3):36-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18322/PVB.2019.28.03.36-49

Views: 668


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-7493 (Print)
ISSN 2587-6201 (Online)