Analysis of the applicability of fire prevention system management models
https://doi.org/10.22227/0869-7493.2025.34.05.79-92
Abstract
Introduction. In modern conditions, the regulation of the fire situation is carried out through the implementation of two main directions: prevention and the creation of a fire safety system. The creation of a fire safety system is provided by the owner of the facility, and fire prevention issues are provided by a wide range of subjects.
Goals and objectives. The purpose of the research is to find a management model for the fire prevention system that regulates the situation with fires and their consequences.
Materials and methods. An expert survey was conducted, and 4 mathematical models for regulating the fire situation were formulated. Verification and interpretation of the results are provided, while only one mathematical model based on the relationship between fire prevention and integral fire risks corresponds to the condition of applicability in modern practice. The methods of statistical analysis (variance, correlation and regression) of the data were applied in the course of the study.
Results and their discussion. Comparison of the magnitude of integral fire risks is possible only for territories where a uniform fire accounting procedure is provided. The classification of municipalities into three main groups (urban, mixed and rural) is substantiated, in which the level of relationship between the amount of preventive work and the magnitude of integral fire risks has significant differences.
The highest level of correlation is observed between the amount of preventive work and the risk of a person dying in a fire. And the value of the coefficient of determination is at an acceptable level (more than 0.5) only for settlements of the “mixed” and “rural” types.
Conclusions. To manage the organizational system of fire prevention, a model based on the relationship between the magnitude of fire risks and the amount of preventive work based on statistical analysis methods is acceptable. The proposed model has a statistical error of about 20 %, which is acceptable for short-term forecasts. However, it should be borne in mind that this model does not have sufficient reliability to assess a similar relationship in urban settlements.
About the Author
G. N. LakhvitskyRussian Federation
Georgy N. LAKHVITSKY, Adjunct of the Department of Information Technology
Borisa Galushkina St., 4, Moscow, 129366
References
1. Mochalova T.A., Mironova N.V. Prevention of fire-related crimes. Young scientists in solving urgent security problems : Collection of materials of the XII All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Zheleznogorsk, 2023; 152-154. EDN SWMVDZ. (rus).
2. Volodchenkova V.V., Peregudova N.V., Kononko P.P., Gavryushenko V.P. Assessment of the activities of local self-government bodies in the field of fire safety: current problems and ways to solve them. Administrative and Municipal law. 2023; 5:80-92. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2023.5.44118. EDN JHLWGZ. (rus).
3. Novikov D.A. Theory of management of organizational systems. 4th Edition, Revised and Expanded. Мoscow, LENAND, 2022; 500.
4. Voronin S.A., Lakhvicky G.N., Repin S.V., Satin A.P. Using the expert estimation method in assessing labor costs of the state fire supervision personnel. Fires and emergencies: prevention, elimination. 2023; 1:78-88. DOI: 10.25257/FE.2023.1.78-88. EDN XYLEEW. (rus).
5. Preobrazhenskaya E.S., Zagumennova M.V., Firsov A.G., Nadtochiy O.V. Burden on the inspection staff of the state fire supervision in 2022. Current Issues in Natural Science : Collection of Proceedings of the VIII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. Ivanovo, 2023; 295-300. EDN IDYFVU. (rus).
6. Satin A.P., Burlachenko K.G., Repin S.V. Some features of sustainable functioning of the supervision division. Technology of technosphere safety. 2021; 3(93):42-60. DOI: 10.25257/TTS.2021.3.93.42-60. EDN OVOPHC. (rus).
7. Kistanova L.A., Repin S.V., Boldyrevsky P.B., Lakhvicky G.N. Mathematical and statistical fire incidence forecasting model for use in the EMERCOM system of Russia. Modeling, optimization, and information technology. 2022; 10-2(37). DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2022.37.2.002. EDN MIPRVJ. (rus).
8. Zobkov D.V., Prisyazhnyuk N.L., Tanygina A.A. Multifactory mathematical model of the dependence of the expected reduction of integrated damage from a number of preventive measures in the residential sector of Russia. Technology of technosphere safety. 2022; 3(97):100-118. DOI: 10.25257/TTS.2022.3.97.100-118. EDN DLRSOG. (rus).
9. Satin A.P., Lakhvicky G.N. A promising algorithm for calculating and visualizing the magnitude of fire risks in a geoinformation system. Proceedings of the international scientific and technical conference “Safety systems”. 2024; 33-1:107-111. EDN BBGOJD. (rus).
10. Fire risks. Dynamics, management, forecasting / ed. by N.N. Brushlinsky, Yu.N. Shebeko. Moscow, FGU VNIIPO, 2007; 370. (rus).
11. Brushlinsky N.N., Sokolov S.V., Klepko E.A., Belov V.A., Ivanova O.V., Popkov S.Yu. Fundamentals of the theory of fire risks and its applications : monograph. Moscow, Academy of State Fire Service of the EMERCOM, 2012; 192. (rus).
12. Brushlinsky N.N., Sokolov S.V., Grigor’eva M.P., Vagner P. How the fire statistics was created. Fires and emergencies: prevention, elimination. 2024; 69-77. DOI: 10.25257/FE.2024.1.69-77. EDN LGGRKF. (rus).
13. Goncharenko V.S., Chechetina T.A., Sibirko V.I., Nadtochiy O.V., Polekhin P.V., Kozlov A.A. et al. Fires and fire safety in 2022. Information and analytical collection. Balashikha, FGBU VNIIPO EMERCOM of Russia, 2023; 80. EDN IKFNVG. (rus).
14. Satin A.P., Lakhvicky G.N., Repin S.V., Voronin S.A. Assessment of integral fire risks in municipalities of the Nizhny Novgorod Region. Modern problems of civil protection. 2023; 2(47):38-45. EDN HRMZIE. (rus).
15. Zhilin O.I. A systematic approach to fire safety propaganda and training in the fire safety measures is the most important component of fire prevention activities. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost’/Fire and explosion safety. 2009; 18(8):33-37. EDN KWXHVV. (rus).
16. Kendrick D., Young B., Mason-Jones A.J., Ilyas N., Achana F.A., Cooper N.J. et al. Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention. Evidence-Based Child Health : A Cochrane Review Journal. 2013; 8(3):761-939. DOI: 10.1002/ebch.1911
17. Golovin N.L. Education of a culture of life safety in the field of education, social advertising and fire prevention. Pedagogical Journal. 2020; 10(6-1):38-49. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2020.64.64.005. EDN ZCXYMM. (rus).
18. Runefors M., Johansson N., van Hees P. The effectiveness of specific fire prevention measures for different population groups. Fire Safety Journal. 2017; 91:1044-1050. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.064. EDN VDFVWV.
19. Makarova T.P., Baturo A.N., Shirinkin P.V. Approach to the using of sociological research in improving preventive activities in the fire safety field. Technosphere safety. 2020; 3(28):150-157. EDN MEASMG. (rus).
20. Al-Hajj S., Desapriya E., Pawliuk C., Garis L., Pike I. Interventions for Preventing Residential Fires in Vulnerable Neighbourhoods and Indigenous Communities : a Systematic Review of the Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(9):5434. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095434. EDN FZACLD.
21. Hwang V., Duchossois G.P., Garcia-Espana J.F., Durbin D.R. Impact of a community based fire prevention intervention on fire safety knowledge and behavior in elementary school children. Injury Prevention. 2006; 12(5):344-346. DOI: 10.1136/ip.2005.011197
22. Frolov N.N., Bobin A.V., Lazovsky A.A. Komogortsev S.I., Sivokozov S.V. The role of preventive measures aimed at preventing death and injury to people in fires. Problems of science. 2022; 6(74):17-21. EDN EEYEWF. (rus).
23. Gielen A.C., Shields W., Frattaroli Sh., McDonald E., Jones V., Bishai D. et al. Enhancing fire department home visiting programs: Results of a community intervention trial. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 2013; 34(4):e250-e256. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182685b3a
24. Ashmarin V.V., Filippov Z.S., Filippova O.A. Preventive and organizational measures to prevent fires at work and at home. Technosphere processes: regional aspect : Collection of materials of the V All-Russian scientific and practical conference, Cheboksary, March 25-26, 2022. Cheboksary, Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulyanov, 2022; 27-35. EDN MOCGBL. (rus).
25. Al-Hajj S., Thomas L., Morris Sh., Clare J., Jennings Ch., Biantoro Ch. et al. Community Fire Risk Reduction: Longitudinal Assessment for HomeSafe Fire Prevention Program in Canada. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(14):6369. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20146369. EDN IZRVNR.
26. Duchossois G.P., Nance M.L., Garcia-Espana J.F., Flores J. Sustainability of an In-Home Fire Prevention Intervention. Journal of Trauma Nursing. 2009; 16(4):194-198. DOI: 10.1097/JTN.0b013e3181ca0876
27. Festag S. Analysis of the effectiveness of the smoke alarm obligation — Experiences from practice. Fire Safety Journal. 2021; 119:103263. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103263. EDN SEMGQH.
28. Tannous W.K., Whybro M., Lewis C., Ollerenshaw M., Watson G., Broomhall S. et al. Using a cluster randomized controlled trial to determine the effects of intervention of battery and hardwired smoke alarms in New South Wales, Australia: Home fire safety checks pilot program. Journal Safety Research. 2016; 56:23-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.11.001
29. Setien M.A., Han D., Zuniga G.C., Mier N., Lucio R.L., Treviño L. Does Injury Prevention Education Initiate Household Changes in a Spanish-Speaking Minority Population? Journal of Community Heal. 2014; 39(1):167-172. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-013-9755-0. EDN MDTMQO.
30. Sund B., Bonander C., Jakobsson N., Jaldell H. Do home fire and safety checks by on-duty firefighters decrease the number of fires? Quasi-experimental evidence from Southern Sweden. Journal of Safety Research. 2019; 70:39-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.04.006
31. Tannous W.K., Agho K. Domestic fire emergency escape plans among the aged in NSW, Australia: The impact of a fire safety home visit program. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):872. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7227-x. EDN UHNJTE.
32. Joffe H., Perez-Fuentes G., Potts H.W.W., Rossetto T. How to increase earthquake and home fire preparedness: The fix-it intervention. Natural Hazards. 2016; 84(3):1943-1965. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2528-1. EDN IVHBEN.
33. Pooley K., Nunez S., Whybro M. Evidence-based practices of effective fire safety education programming for children. Australian Journal of Emergency Management. 2021; 36(2):34-41. DOI: 10.47389/36.2.34
34. King W.J., Klassen T.P., LeBlanc J., Bernard-Bonnin A.-C., Robitaille Y., Pham B. et al. The Effectiveness of a Home Visit to Prevent Childhood Injury. Pediatrics. 2001; 108(2):382-388. DOI: 10.1542/peds.108.2.382
35. Lehna C., Merrell J., Furmanek S., Twyman S. Home fire safety intervention pilot with urban older adults living in Wales. Burn. Journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries. 2017; 43:69-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.06.025
36. Smith G.A., Kistamgari S., Splaingard M. Optimizing Smoke Alarm Signals for Those at Highest Risk for Residential Fire-Related Death: Testing the Effectiveness of Children’s Smoke Alarms for Sleeping Older Adults. Fire Technology. 2021; 58:311-326. DOI: 10.1007/s10694-021-01147-5
37. Prus Yu.V., Chistyakova A.A., Rossinskaya K.G. Management of preventive activities at risk-based on a matrix representation of risks. Technosphere safety. 2019; 4(25):43-50. EDN XLVXHY. (rus).
38. Andreev Yu.A., Elfimova M.V., Mel’nik A.A., Shirinkin P.V., Baturo A.N. About the possible approach to the effectiveness’s evaluating and the relevance of preventive measures in the field of fire safety. Modern problems of civil protection. 2018; 2(27):56-61. EDN XWXQBN. (rus).
39. Lakhvicky G.N. Analysis of the impact of preventive work on the dynamics of fire based on statistical data. Siberian fire rescue bulletin. 2023; 3(30):65-72. DOI: 10.34987/vestnik.sibpsa.2023.30.3.007. EDN JYHOSB. (rus).
40. Avdeenko A.M., Satin A.P., Nguen V.A. Features of selection of neural networks for assessing the effectiveness of preventive measures. Technology of technosphere safety. 2024; 3(105):55-68. DOI: 10.25257/TTS.2024.3.105.55-68. EDN UNVUHM. (rus).
Review
For citations:
Lakhvitsky G.N. Analysis of the applicability of fire prevention system management models. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2025;34(5):79-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/0869-7493.2025.34.05.79-92























