Preview

Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety

Advanced search

Destructible elements of safety structures used to minimize the consequences of explosive accidents in premises

https://doi.org/10.22227/0869-7493.2023.32.06.69-78

Abstract

Introduction. The relevance of the present publication is caused by the fact that during the development of constructive decisions of safety locking devices (SLD) designers often use elements and materials, which are fundamentally not applicable for these purposes. The peculiarities of safety structures (SS) and light removable structures (LRS) used in buildings and premises where internal emergency explosion is possible are analyzed. The results of experimental studies on testing the performance of real structures are given.

Objective. Determination of the possibility of SS and LRS application at explosive objects, as well as restrictions on their fastening elements and used materials.

Materials and methods. Studies of LRS fixed by SLD were carried out by means of their tests on the impact of internal emergency explosion and on resistance to mechanical and wind loads (according to GOST 26602.5). Explosion tests were carried out in a cubic chamber using a propane-air mixture of stoichiometric composition. Overpressure sensors recorded explosive pressure. Video recording of the explosion process was done by speed cameras.

Results. The features of safety structures used to reduce the pressure generated by internal accidental explosions were analyzed. Explosive pressure oscillograms were constructed and analyzed based on the test results. It is shown that the use of static (wind or mechanical) loads instead of explosive loads in SS performance testing can lead to significant distortion of test results. It is experimentally established that testing of specimens of safety structures for their serviceability should be carried out only by modelling of explosive load.

Conclusions. Substitution of explosive loads for static loads during SS testing may lead to their failure in case of emergency explosion in real conditions, which may result in collapse of building structures and human casualties. Thus, testing of specimens of safety structures for their operability should be carried out only by modelling of explosive load.

About the Authors

A. D. Korolchenko
National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
Russian Federation

Anton D. KOROLCHENKO, Head of Testing Sector of Explosion Safety Research Center, Institute of Integrated Safety in Construction, Lecturer of Department of Integrated Safety in Construction

Yaroslavskoe Shosse, 26, Moscow, 129337

ID RISC: 890113; Scopus AuthorID: 57215919375; ResearcherID: E-3295-2017



N. V. Gromov
National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
Russian Federation

Nikolay V. GROMOV, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Deputy Head of Institute of Integrated Safety in Construction, Senior Lecturer of Department of Integrated Safety in Construction

Yaroslavskoe Shosse, 26, Moscow, 129337

ID RISC: 550242; Scopus AuthorID: 57192376754; ResearcherID: AAO-5120-2021



References

1. Pilyugin L.P. Constructions of explosive production facilities. Moscow, Stroyizdat, 1988; 314. (rus).

2. Komarov A.A. Forecasting loads from emergency deflagration explosions and assessing the consequences of their impact on buildings and structures : Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Technical Sciences. Moscow, MGSU, 2001; 460. (rus).

3. Bradly D. Evolution of flame propagation in large diameter explosions. Proceedings of 2nd International Seminar on Fire-and-Explosion Hazard of Substances and Venting Deflagrations. Molkov V.V. (ed.). Moscow, All-Russian Research Institute for Fire Protection, 1997; 51-59.

4. Solberg D.M. Observations of flame instabilities in large scale vented gas explosions. 18th Symposium (International) the combustion institute. 1980; 1607-1614.

5. Molkov V.V., Grigorash A.V., Eber R.M. Vented gaseous deflagrations: Modelling of springloaded inertial vent covers. Fire Safety Journal. 2005; 40(4):307-319. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2005.01.004

6. Chen D., Wu C., Li J., Liao K. A numerical study of gas explosion with progressive venting in a utility tunnel. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2022; 162:1124-1138. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.05.009

7. Chmielewski R., Bąk A. Analysis of the safety of residential buildings under gas explosion loads. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021; 43:102815. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102815

8. Zhan Li, Li Chen, Qin Fang, Wensu Chen, Hong Hao, Rong Zhu, Kang Zheng. Experimental and numerical study on CFRP strip strengthened clay brick masonry walls subjected to vented gas explosions. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2019; 129:66-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.02.013

9. Chengjun Yue, Li Chen, Zhan Li, Yuanchao Mao, Xiaohu Yao. Experimental study on gas explosions of methane-air mixtures in a full-scale residence building. Fuel. 2023; 353:129166. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129166

10. Jialin Li, Xuebiao Wang, Jin Guo, Jiaqing Zhang, Su Zhang. Effect of concentration and ignition position on vented methane-air explosions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2020; 68:104334. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104334

11. Komarov A.A., Korolchenko D.A., Gromov N.V. Experimental determination of glazing efficiency in case of indoor explosions caused by accidents. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2022; 31(6):78-90. DOI: 10.22227/0869-7493.2022.31.06.78-9 (rus).

12. Maksakova A.V. Study of regulatory documentation on the topic of easily resettable structures and proposals for changing it. Youth Innovations : collection of materials from the seminar of young scientists within the framework of the XXIII International Scientific Conference. Moscow, 2020; 144-147. (rus).

13. Gorev V.A. Scale model operation of formation of pressure at internal explosion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020; 1425:012177. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1425/1/012177

14. Pilyugin L.P. Maintenance explosion proof buildings with relief designs. Moscow, Pozhnauka Publ., 2000; 224. (rus).

15. Shleg A.M. Determination of the parameters of easily dropped structures : Dissertation for the degree of candidate of technical sciences. Moscow, MGSU, 2002; 201. (rus).

16. Polandov Yu.K., Korоlchenko D.A., Evich A.A. Conditions of occurrence of fire in the room with a gas explosion. Experimental data. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2020; 29(1):9-21. DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2020.29.01.9-21 (rus).

17. Korolchenko O.N., Korolchenko A.D. Determining the burst pressure of vent structures with account taken of wind loads. Vestnik MGSU. 2022; 17(7):914-921. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2022.7.914-921 (rus).

18. Strel`chuk N.A., Orlov G.G. Determination of the area of ejection structures in explosive production buildings. Industrial Engineering. 1969; 19-22. (rus).

19. Korоlchenko D., Polandov Iu.K., Evich A. On ignition of combustible material in a gas explosion in the premise. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 869(5):052056. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/869/5/052056

20. Korоlchenko D., Polandov Iu.K., Evich A. Dynamic Effects at Internal Deflagration Explosions. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering. 2019; 603(5):052008. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/603/5/052008

21. Komarov A.A., Korolchenko D.A., Phan T.A. Features of determination of the dynamic amplification factor under impulse loads. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2018; 27(2-3):37-43. DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2018.27.02-03.37-43 (rus).

22. Polandov Iu., Korolchenko D. The consideration of the turbulence influence on the gas explosion expansion in non-closed areas. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2017; 106(01040):8. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201710601040

23. Gromov N.V. Improving the technical system for ensuring the explosion resistance of buildings during explosions of gas-steam-air mixtures : dissertation for the degree of candidate of technical sciences. Moscow, MGSU, 2007; 134. (rus).


Review

For citations:


Korolchenko A.D., Gromov N.V. Destructible elements of safety structures used to minimize the consequences of explosive accidents in premises. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2023;32(6):69-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/0869-7493.2023.32.06.69-78

Views: 271


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-7493 (Print)
ISSN 2587-6201 (Online)