Simulation modelling and decision criteria for fire protection of public buildings
https://doi.org/10.22227/0869-7493.2023.32.04.5-14
Abstract
Introduction. Flexible rationing determines the design objectives of the fire protection system of the object, and the ways to achieve them are chosen by the designer. The fulfilment of the set task is confirmed by the verification of criteria. The purpose of the article is to show the possibilities of using simulation modelling to implement the objectives of flexible rationing of fire protection systems of public buildings.
Theoretical foundations of simulation modelling. It is proposed to take into account individual fire risk and the risk of material losses in case of fire during simulation modelling. To draw one random fire scenario, an approved procedure for calculating individual fire risk is used, which is included in the main block. The list of random input variables, the areas of their change, the drawing of values, the processing of simulation results, the choice of solutions based on the results obtained, modelling control is carried out in the second block of the simulation system.
Results and their discussion. The application of simulation modelling is justified for the choice of rational decisions on fire safety. The designer based on the conditions of the object and fire safety requirements can choose the criterion and system of object protection by solving a multi-criteria problem. Models for assessing the reliability of the use of primary fire extinguishing means, fire extinguishing by the fire brigade in the fire centre, reliability of fire protection building structures, fire doors, separate or as part of fire barriers are proposed. The system of criteria is formulated, including the following criteria: individual fire risk, reduced costs, “evacuation time reserve”, necessary evacuation time.
On the basis of statistics obtained as a result of simulation modelling, the designer determines the required indicators. The formula for calculating the number of tests depending on the accuracy of determining the mathematical expectation, dispersion of random values of statistical parameters is given.
Conclusions. It is proposed to use Monte Carlo simulation modelling in the framework of flexible rationing when designing fire protection systems. Decision-making criteria that take into account the characteristics of fire risks are systematized. Calculated estimates of the effectiveness of a number of fire-fighting measures are given.
About the Authors
V. I. PrisadkovRussian Federation
Vladimir I. PRISADKOV, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Main Researcher
VNIIPO, 12, Balashikha, Moscow Region, 143903
S. V. Muslakova
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. MUSLAKOVA, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Leading Researcher of Department of Fire Modeling and Non-Standard Design
VNIIPO, 12, Balashikha, Moscow Region, 143903
A. A. Abashkin
Russian Federation
Aleksandr A. ABASHKIN, Head of Department of Fire Modeling and Non-Standard Design
VNIIPO, 12, Balashikha, Moscow Region, 143903
K. V. Prisadkov
Russian Federation
Konstantin V. PRISADKOV, Chief Engineer
Bolshaya Moskovskaya St., 61, Vladimir, 600000
References
1. Tinaburri А. Princiles for Monte Carlo agent-based evacuation simulations including occupants who need assistance. From RSET to RISET. Fire Safety Journal. 2022; 127:103510. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103510
2. Prisadkov V.I., Muslakova S.V., Kosterin I.V., Fadeev V.E., Shamaev F.M. Engineering method of selection of rational variant of fire protection of objects with economic responsibility. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2016; 8:49-57. DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2016.25.08.49-57 (rus).
3. Poon S. A dynamic approach to ASET/RSET assessment in performance based design. Procedia Engineering. 2014; 71:173-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.04.025
4. Ventsel E.S. Research of operations. Moscow, Soviet Radio Publ., 1972; 407. (rus).
5. Моlchadskiy I.S. Fire in the room. Moscow, VNIIPO, 2005; 456. (rus).
6. Peacock R.D., Hoskins B.I. A review of building evacuation models. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2010. Technical Note 1680.
7. McGrattan K., Hostikka S., McDermott R., Floyd J., Weinschenk C., Overholt K. Fire dynamics simulator. Technical Reference Guide. Vol. 3: Validation. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2015.
8. Heskestand G. Fire plumes, flame height, and air entrainment. Handbook of Protection Engineering. 3rd ed. Chapter 1. Springer, New York, 2016; 2-1, 2-17. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_13
9. Kholshchevnikov V.V., Samoshin D.A. Evacuation and behavior of people in case of fires. Moscow, Academy of State Fire Service of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia, 2009; 212. (rus).
10. Kholshchevnikov V.V. Epistemology of human flows : monograph. Moscow, Academy of State Fire Service of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia, 2019; 592. (rus).
11. Prisadkov V.I. Development of methods for selecting rational options for fire protection systems of industrial buildings : dissertation of the Doctor of Technical Sciences. Moscow, VNIIPO, 1990; 540. (rus).
12. Isachkov A.V., Prisadkov V.I. A model of fire propagation through a building based on probabilistic networks. Safety of people during fires in buildings and structures : collection of scientific papers. Moscow, VNIIPO, 1987; 69-77. (rus).
13. Prisadkov V.I., Isachkov A.V., Litskevich V.V., Dudarev G.I. A fire simulator in a building and the choice of an economically feasible fire protection option. Problems of fire safety of objects and administrative-territorial units : a collection of scientific papers. Moscow, VNIIPO, 1988; 24-30. (rus).
14. Prisadkov V.I., Maslakova S.V., Khatuntseva S.Yu., Kosterin I.V., Fadeev V.E., Shamaeva A.M. Design assessment of the efficiency of fire fighting in the seat by the in-building fire. Pozharnaya Bezopasnost’/Fire Safety. 2017; 1: 49-54. (rus).
15. Terebnev V.V. Handbook of the fire extinguishing manager. Technical capabilities of fire departments. Moscow, Pozhkniga Publ., 2004; 256. (rus).
16. Кosterin I.V., Muslakova S.V., Prisadkov V.I., Fadeev V.E. Safety coefficients and reliability of building structures in case of fire. Materials of the XXIX International scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the FSBI VNIIPO EMERCOM of Russia. Moscow, 2017; 295-296. (rus).
17. Prisadkov V.I., Molchadsky I.S., Litskevich V.V., Gudkov A.A. Probabilistic method for calculating the reliability of structures in case of fire. Construction mechanics and calculation of structures. 1990; 1:22-25. (rus).
18. Abolentsev Yu.I. Economics of fire protection. Moscow, VIPTSH of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the USSR, 1985; 216. (rus).
19. Schröder B., Arnold L., Seyfried A. A map representation of the ASET-RSET concept. Fire Safety Journal. 2020; 115:103154. DOI: 10/1016/j.firesaf.2020.103154
20. Ronchi E. Developing and validating evacuation models for fire safety engineering. Fire Safety Journal. 2021; 120:103020. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103020
21. Grandison A. Determining confidence intervals, and convergence, for parameters in stochastic evacuation models. Fire Technology. 2020; 56:2137-2177. DOI: 10.1007/s10694-020-00968-0
22. Rzhanitsyn A.R. Theory of calculation of building structures for reliability. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1978; 239. (rus).
Review
For citations:
Prisadkov V.I., Muslakova S.V., Abashkin A.A., Prisadkov K.V. Simulation modelling and decision criteria for fire protection of public buildings. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2023;32(4):5-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/0869-7493.2023.32.04.5-14