On the rational targeted development of the integrated security system at the enterprises of the oil and gas complex of Russia

Introduction. The article presents a comprehensive security system created at the enterprises of the oil and gas complex of Russia, which requires constant improvement and development. The transition of the system under consideration to a new qualitative level is possible with the development of an integrated intersectoral approach based not only on the use of scientific and technical achievements in the field of reliability of the functioning of physical objects, but also in the development of new scientific results for the implementation of organizational and technical measures in the complex security of enterprises.

Goals and objectives. The main purpose of the presented article is to improve the state of the integrated safety system at the enterprises of the oil and gas complex of Russia, by solving the tasks of rational and targeted development of subsystems (industrial and fire safety, labor protection), their transition to a new qualitative level of development.

To achieve the goal, 4 tasks requiring solutions are formulated.

Results of solving problems.

When solving problem No. 1, conclusions are drawn:

• the average proportion of all joint events summing up by years causing damage (accidents and fires) is about 20 % per year;
• the average economic damage from joint hazards (accidents and fires) is about 40 % of the total damage per year, i.e. about 1.5 billion rubles;
• the average level of sanitary and irretrievable losses of personnel at the enterprises of the NGK of Russia is about 38 %, about 300 people per year.

In solving problem No. 2, the formulated concepts for integrated security, integrated security systems, rational and targeted development of the integrated security system at the enterprises of the oil and gas complex of Russia are presented.

When solving problem No. 3, a model is presented that allows comparing the qualitative indicators of the functioning of existing and developing integrated security systems at the enterprises of the oil and gas complex of Russia.

When solving problem No. 4, the use of a new rational-target model of the development of the CB system at the enterprises of the NGK of Russia is justified and demonstrated, and an example is presented that proves the adequacy of its use.

Conclusions. The application of the developed rational-target model for the development of the CB system at the enterprises of the NGK of Russia, allows in practice to solve the problem of reducing damage from accidents and fires in the system under consideration, i.e. to solve a problem of important socio-economic importance for Russia.

1. Makhutov N.A., Permyakov V.N., Akhmetkhanov R.S., Reznikov D.O., Dubinin E.F. Risk analysis and ensuring the security of critical facilities of the petrochemical complex : textbook. Tyumen, TSOGU, 2013; 560. (rus).

2. Gvozdev E. On the probability determination of the reliability of a technosphere object under hazardous influence. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020; 869(5):052043. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/869/5/052043

3. Gvozdev E.V. The assessment of the integrated safety of Russian oil and gas enterprises. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2022; 31(1):49-64. DOI: 10.22227/0869-7493.2022.31.01.49-64 (rus).

4. Kryvenko G.M., Lialiuk-Viter G.D., Shymkent V.Ya. The issues of preventing occupational injuries of workers in the oil and gas industry. Prospecting and Development of Oil and Gas Fields. 2021; 2(79):64-72. DOI: 10.31471/1993‑9973‑2021‑2(79)-64-72

5. Homer J. A comprehensive approach to enterprise network security management : Ph.D Dissertation. 2009; 134.

6. Dotsenko S., Illiashenko O., Kamenskyi S., Kharchenko V. Embedding an integrated security management system into Industry 4.0 enterprise management: Cybernetic approach. In Studies in Big Data. 2021; 84:279-296. DOI: 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑65722‑2_17

7. Dolgov A.I. Preparation and examination of dissertations : monograph. Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, 1995. (rus).

8. Gvozdev E.V., Matvienko Yu.G. Comprehensive risk assessment at the life support enterprises with hazardous production facilities. Occupational Safety in Industry. 2019; 10:69-78. DOI: 10.24000/0409‑2961‑2019‑10‑69‑78 (rus).

9. Qingsong X., Leiguang J., Xuedong L. Decision-making optimization of complex product design task change perturbation based on prospect theory. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. 2020; 34(1). DOI: 10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2020.01.020

10. Gvozdev E. Visualization and diagnostics of reliability of the object with changing the functioning conditions. E3S Web of Conferences. Moscow, 2021; 263:02009. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202126302009

11. Marquez-Tejon J., Jimenez-Partearroyo M., Benito-Osorio D. Security as a key contributor to organisational resilience: a bibliometric analysis of enterprise security risk management. Security Journal. 2022; 35(2):600-627. DOI: 10.1057/s41284‑021‑00292‑4

12. D’yakonova I., Nikitina A., Sukhonos V., Zhuravka F. Methodological bases of estimating the efficiency of economic security management of the enterprises in the global environment. Investment Management and Financial Innovations. 2018; 15(2):145-153. DOI: 10.21511/imfi.15(2).2018.13

13. Petruzzi J., Loyear R. Improving organisational resilience through enterprise security risk management. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning. 2016; 10(1):44-56.

14. Akimov V.A., Didenko S.L. Interdisciplinary studies of problems of integrated safety and security: current situation and solutions. Safety and Emergencies Problems. 2019; 6:16-26. DOI: 10.36535/0869‑4176‑2019‑06‑2 (rus).

15. Barry A., Born G., Weszkalnys G. Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society. 2008; 37(1):20-49. DOI: 10.1080/03085140701760841

16. Locatelli B., Vallet A., Tassin J., Gautier D., Chamaret A., Sist P. Collective and individual interdisciplinarity in a sustainability research group: A social network analysis. Sustainability Science. 2021; 16(1):37-52. DOI: 10.1007/s11625‑020‑00860‑4

17. Odintsov B.E. Balanced-target management of enterprise development: models and technology : monograph. A.N. Romanov (ed.). Moscow, University Textbook; INFRA-M Publ., 2017; 161. (rus).

18. Odintsovo B.E. Management equilibrium development of objects on the basis of intelligent information systems. Informatization of Education and Science. 2019; 1(41):151-163. (rus).

19. Dubinina N.A., Uskov V.V. Approaches to assessing the balance of enterprise development. Vestnik of Astrakhan state technical university. Series: Economics. 2011; 1:164-172. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16375150 (rus).

20. Gvozdev E.V., Matvienko Yu.G. To ensure comprehensive safety of enterprises with hazardous production facilities. Problems of Safety and Emergency Situations : scientific information collection. 2020; 2:72-81. DOI: 10.36535/0869‑4176‑2020‑02‑9 (rus).

21. Brych V., Halysh N. Resource approach to strategic management of tourism enterprises. Innovative economy. 2020; 1-2:125-132. DOI: 10.37332/23091533.2020.1-2.18