The fire safety of infrastructure facilities for hydrogen-powered vehicles
https://doi.org/10.22227/0869-7493.2022.31.02.41-51
Abstract
Introduction. The article offers an analytical review of domestic and foreign publications on the fire safety of hydrogen refueling stations and garages for hydrogen-powered vehicles.
General characteristics of the fire hazard of infrastructure facilities for hydrogen-powered vehicles. The authors offer the general characteristic of a specific fire hazard from facilities using compressed and liquid hydrogen.
Hydrogen refueling stations. Refueling stations using compressed and liquid hydrogen were considered in the article. It was found that compressors are the most hazardous items installed at refueling stations; therefore, the value of potential risks, arising in the area of a refueling station, exceeds 10–4 year–1. Experiments, simulating accidents at hydrogen refueling stations, are described. According to the authors, the minimal distance between the compressor and facilities located outside the station area should exceed 50 m.
Garages for hydrogen-powered vehicles. Features of the fire safety of garages for hydrogen-powered vehicles were analyzed. The authors have found that the overpressure inside a small garage (an individual garage) can reach 55 kPa in case of a jet flame caused by the release of hydrogen through the safety valves of fuel tanks. The overpressure of a hydrogen jet can reach 10 kPa in case of the unignited release of hydrogen. High pressure values that accompany the jet formation are triggered by the high normal burning velocity of hydrogen that boosts the velocity of heat release in the flame front, exceeding the same value for flares of hydrocarbon gases. Therefore, requirements, applicable to storage premises designated for vehicles powered by hydrocarbon fuel, may be erroneously extended to garages for hydrogen-powered vehicles (pursuant to NFPA 2).
Conclusions. The results of this analysis can be contributed to regulatory documents to be developed in the area of fire safety of infrastructure facilities for hydrogen-powered vehicles.
About the Authors
D. M. GordienkoRussian Federation
Denis M. Gordienko, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Head of Institute
ID RISC: 301154; Scopus Author ID: 2073393280; Researcher ID: 301154
12, Balashikha, Moscow Region, 143903
Yu. N. Shebeko
Russian Federation
Yury N. Shebeko, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Chief Researcher
ID RISC: 47042; Scopus Author ID: 7006511704
12, Balashikha, Moscow Region, 143903
References
1. Shebeko Yu.N. Normative documents on fire safety of infrastructure objects of hydrogen energetic. Pozarnaya Bezopasnost/Fire Safety. 2020; 4:36-42. DOI: 10.37657/vniipo.pb.2020.101.4.003 (rus).
2. Shebeko Yu.N. Fire safety of hydrogen filling stations. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2020; 29(4):42-50. (rus).
3. Povalyaev A.E., Kolbasov A.F., Kozlov V.N. Safety of transport on hydrogen fuel. Alternative Fuel Transport. Special issue. 2021; 25-30.(rus).
4. Hansen O.R. Hydrogen infrastructure — Efficient risk assessment and design optimization approach to ensure safe and practical solutions. Process Safety and Environment Protection. 2020; 143:164-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.06.028
5. Hansen O.R. Liquid hydrogen releases show dense gas behavior. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2020; 45:1343-1358. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.060
6. Fridrich A., Breitung W., Stern G., Veser A., Kuznetsov M. Ignition and heat radiation of cryogenic hydrogen jets. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012; 37:17589-17598. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.070
7. Makeev V.I. Safety of objects with an application of liquid cryogenic products. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 1992; 1(3):34-45. (rus).
8. Bolodian I.A., Kestenboym H.S., Makhviladze G.M., Makeev V.I., Fedotov A.P., Chuguev A.P. Fire and explosion hazard of low temperature clouds of hydrogen in atmosphere. Heterogeneous and Gas Systems Combustion : Proceedings of the 9th All-Union Symposium on Combustion and Explosion. Chernogolovka, Institute of Chemical Physics, 1989; 15-17. (rus).
9. Yang F., Wang T., Deng X., Dang J., Huang Z., Hu S. et al. Review on hydrogen safety issues: Incident statistics, hydrogen diffusion, and detonation process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2021; 46:31467-31488. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.005
10. Abohamzeh E., Salehi F., Sheikholeslami M., Abbassi R. Review of hydrogen safety during storage, transmission, and applications processes. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2021; 72:104569. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104569
11. Pique S., Wienberger B., De-Dianous V., Debray B. Comparative study of regulations, codes and standards and practices on hydrogen fuelling stations. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2017; 42(11):7429-7439. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.158
12. Tsunemi K., Kihara T., Kato E., Kawamoto A., Saburi T. Quantitative risk assessment of the interior of a hydrogen refueling station considering safety barrier systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2019; 44:23522-23531. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.027
13. Shirvill E.C., Roberts T.A., Royle M., Willoughby D.B., Sathiah P. Effects of congestion and confining walls on turbulent deflagrations in a hydrogen storage facility — Part 1: Experimental study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2018; 43:7618-7642. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.135
14. Tanaka T., Azuma T., Evans J.A., Cronin P.M., Jonson D.M., Cleaver R.P. Experimental study on hydrogen explosions in a full-scale hydrogen filling station model. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2007; 32:2162-2170. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.04.019
15. Pan X., Li Z., Zhang C., Lv H., Liu S., Ma J. Safety study of wind-solar hybrid renewable hydrogen refueling station in China. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2016; 41:13315-13321.
16. Karpov V.L. Fire safety of regular and accidental releases of flammable gases. Part 1. Limiting conditions of stable combustion and extinguishing of jet flames in a still air. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 1998; 7(3):36-43. (rus).
17. Saffers J.-B., Molkov V.V. Towards hydrogen safety engineering for reacting and non-reacting hydrogen releases. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2013; 26:344-350. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.05.002
18. Chance J.La, Houf W., Middleton B., Fluer L. Analysis support development of risk-informed separation distances for hydrogen codes and standards. SAND2009-0874. Albuquerque, Sandia National Laboratory, 2009; 121.
19. Pitts W.M., Yang J.C., Blais M., Joyce A. Dispersion and burning behavior of hydrogen released in a full-scale residential garage in the presence and absence of conventional automobiles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2012; 37:17457-17469. DOI: 10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2012.03.074
20. Shebeko Yu.N., Keller V.D., Eremenko O.Ya., Smolin I.M. Peculiarities of formation and combustion of local hydrogen/air mixtures in a large volume. Khimicheskaya Promishlennost/Chemical Industry. 1988; 12:728-731.(rus).
21. Brennan S., Hussein H.G., Makarov D., Shentsov V., Molkov V.V. Pressure effects of an ignited release from onboard storage in a garage with a single vent. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2019; 44:8927-8934. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.130
22. Makarov D., Shentsov V., Kuznetsov M., Molkov V.V. Pressure peaking phenomenon: model validation against unignited release and jet fire experiments. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2018; 43:9454-9469. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.162
23. Brennan S., Molkov V. Safety assessment of unignited hydrogen discharge from onboard storage in garages with low levels of natural ventilation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013; 38:8159-8166. DOI: 10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2012.08.036
24. Zhiyong Li, Yiying Luo. Comparison of hazard distances and accident duration between hydrogen vehicles and CNG vehicles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2019; 44:8954-8959.
25. Bauwens C.R., Dorofeev S.B. CFD modeling and consequence analysis of an accidental hydrogen release in a large scale facility. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2014; 39:20447-20454.
26. Lack A.W., Gaathaug A.V., Vaagsaether K. Pressure peaking phenomena: Unignited hydrogen release in confined spaces — Large scale experiments. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2020; 45:32702-32712.
27. Zeldovich Ya.B., Barenblatt G.I., Librovich V.B., Makhviladze G.M. Mathematical theory of combustion and explosion. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980; 478. (rus).
28. Zeldovich Ya.B., Voevodskii V.V. Thermal explosion and a flame propagation in gases. Alma Ata, Kazakh State University, 2004; 210. (rus).
29. Fire and explosion hazard of substances and materials and fire extinguishing agents : handbook. A.N. Baratov and A.Ya. Korolchenko (Eds.). Vol. 1, 2. Moscow, Khimiya Publ., 1990. (rus).
Review
For citations:
Gordienko D.M., Shebeko Yu.N. The fire safety of infrastructure facilities for hydrogen-powered vehicles. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2022;31(2):41-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/0869-7493.2022.31.02.41-51