The assessment of the integrated safety of Russian oil and gas enterprises

Introduction. The article addresses the choice of a method used to analyze hierarchies and pairwise comparisons (hereinafter — MAH), that serve as a framework for an integrated corporate safety assessment methodology. Its application ensures the transformation of input information, obtained in the form of a characteristic description of an assessed event, into the resulting assessment that has a weighted numerical value.

Goals and objectives. The main purpose of the article is to obtain an assessment result in respect of the actions that are added to industrial and fire safety checklists applied to assure the integrated safety of an enterprise. A selected MAH is used to make pairwise comparisons of factors and alternatives. Values of local and global priorities can be determined for each element under study. Weighted coefficients, obtained in the form of local priorities, are related to the activities being checked, while global priorities are directly related to the services (structural units) that ensure the sustainable integrated security of an enterprise.

Methods. The authors provide a rationale for the choice of MAH, which allows itemizing the values demonstrating the intensity of influence of factors and break them down into components. At the stage of synthesizing the obtained analytical results with the help of MAH, the results obtained by expertise must be verified by determining the value of the expert consistency ratio to confirm the adequacy of the obtained result.

Results. The probability of influence of analyzed hazards, related to accidents and fires at the enterprises under consideration, was assessed as a function of their causes during the 7-year period under review. The article presents calculated coefficients of communication, impacts and influence made by specialists employed with respective services (structural units) on the industrial and fire safety subsystems that encompassed the integra­ted safety of an enterprise. The results of introducing correction factor g, whose dependence is expressed by final indicators of damage measured in economic (ruble) and social (human) losses, are presented.

Discussion. The article focuses on the fact that the sustainable operation of industrial enterprises depends on the reliability margin of integrated corporate safety, the maintenance of which requires particular resources (financial, material resources, as well as the time, needed for the personnel to eliminate any identified deviations, etc.). Given that the resources focused on the integrated safety assurance are limited, they cannot meet all requests made by the heads of services (departments), while highly risky targeted activities need more research.

1. Abrosimov N.V., Ageev A.I., Akimov V.A., Aksyutin O.E., Aldoshin S.M., Aleshin A.V. et al. Security of Russia. Legal, socio-economic, scientific and technical aspects. Fundamental and applied problems of complex security. Makhutova N.A. (ed.). Moscow, Znanie Publ., 2017; 992. (rus).

2. Gordienko D.M., Shebeko A.Yu., Zuban A.V., Shebeko Yu.N., Molchanov V.P., Voevoda S.S. Fire risk assessment for large storage of liquefied natural gas. Pozharnaya bezopasnost’/Fire Safety. 2017; 3:26-31. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30014168 (rus).

3. Landucci G., Argenti F., Cozzani V., Reniers G. Assessment of attack likelihood to support security risk assessment studies for chemical facilities. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2017; 110: 102-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.06.019

4. Zhukov I.S., Lisanov M.V., Samuseva E.A. Criteria for tolerable social risk in case of accidents at hazardous production facilities. Occupational safety in industry. 2020; 5:79-86. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-5-79-86 (rus).

5. Vairo T., Pontiggia M., Fabiano B. Critical aspects of natural gas pipelines risk assessments. A case-study application on buried layout. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2021; 149:258-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.10.050

6. Gvozdev E.V., Gribanova E.B., Matvienko Yu.G. Methodology for Analysis of the Indicators of the Human Factor Effect on the Integrated Safety and Security of Electric Power Enterpri¬ses. Occupational safety in industry. 2020; 12:38-43. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-12-38-43 (rus).

7. Gvozdev E.V., Matvienko Yu.G. Comprehensive Risk Assessment at the Life Support Enterprises with Hazardous Production Facilities. Occupational safety in industry. 2019; 10:69-78. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-10-69-78 (rus).

8. Ding L., Khan F., Ji J. Risk-based safety measure allocation to prevent and mitigate storage fire hazards. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2020; 135:282-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.01.008

9. Zhu Q.J., Su G.H. Research on the human resources performance management based on the strategic direction data mode analysis. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2014; 687-691:4560-4563. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.687-691.4560

10. Emmers R. Comprehensive security and resilience in Southeast Asia: ASEAN’s approach to terrorism 1. The Pacific Review. 2009; 22(2):159-177. DOI: 10.1080/09512740902815300

11. Abrosimov N.V., Aksyutin O.E., Alyoshin A.V., Aleshin N.P., Akhmetkhanov R.S., Barishpolets V.A. et al. Security of Russia. Legal, socio-economic, scientific and technical aspects. scientific foundations of industrial safety. Moscow, Znanie Publ., 2019; 824. (rus).

12. Gvozdev E.V., Matvienko Yu.G. To ensure complex safety of enterprises with hazardous production facilities. Problems of safety and emergency situations. Scientific information collection. 2020; 2:72-81. DOI: 10.36535/0869-4176-2020-02-9 (rus).

13. Makhutov N.A., Matvienko Yu.G., Romanov A.N. Problems of strength, technogenic safety and structural materials science : Monograph. Moscow, URSS, 2018; 720. (rus).

14. Gorecky D., Schmitt M., Loskyll M., Zühlke D. Human-machine-interaction in the industry 4.0 era. 2014 12th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN). 2014. DOI: 10.1109/INDIN.2014.6945523

15. Donham K.J., Thelin A., Donham K.J., Thelin A. General Environmental Hazards in Agriculture Communities. Agricultural Medicine. 2016; 251-291. DOI: 10.1002/9781118647356.ch7

16. Makhutov N.A., Fridlyand Ya.M., Raspopov A.A., Lisanov M.V. Development of approaches to sol¬ving the problems of ensuring strength, service life and safety of the trunk oil transportation. Occupational safety in industry. 2019; 9:7-14. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2019-9-7-14 (rus).

17. Zhao S., Song J., Ermon S. The information autoencoding family: A lagrangian perspective on latent variable generative models. 34th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2018, UAI 2018. 2018.

18. Mróz K., Hager I., Korniejenko K. Material Solutions for Passive Fire Protection of Buildings and Structures and Their Performances Testing. Procedia Engineering. 2016; 151:284-291. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.388

19. Makhutov N.A., Gadenin M.M., Buinovsky S.N., Grazhdankin A.I. Scientific Fundamentals of Industrial Safety in the Multivolume Series “Safety of Russia. Legal, Socio-Economic and Scientific-Technical Aspects”. Occupational safety in industry. 2020; 4:17-26. DOI: 10.24000/0409-2961-2020-4-17-26 (rus).

20. Saati T. Decision-making. Method of hierarchy analysis : Trans. from English. M.: Radio and communication Publ., 1993; 320. (rus).

21. Gvozdev E.V., Rybakov A.V. About the methodology for assessing the state of fire safety the enterprise JSC “Mosvodokanal”. Scientific and educational problems of civil protection. 2014; 3:68-80. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-metodike-otsenki-sostoyaniya-pozharnoy- bezopasnosti-na-predpriyatii-oao-mosvodokanal (rus).