Preview

Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety

Advanced search

A research on rigid polyurethane foam resistibility to ignition from an electric arc welding spark

https://doi.org/10.22227/0869-7493.2022.31.01.14-20

Abstract

Introduction. A fire investigation assumes that electric arc welding sparks (hereinafter referred to as “sparks”) are effective sources of ignition. However, the spark ignition of a combustible material depends on the contact time. This work has experimentally proven that a smooth vertical wall, made of combustible rigid polyurethane foam (PUF), is not subjected to spark ignition. To explain this fact, the author calculated the time of contact between the spark and the wall τint, and compared it with the minimal estimated contact time τmin required to ignite the wall.

The sample and the testing procedure. Sparks (the arc power up to 6 kW, the current up to 160 A) reached the PUF wall located at a distance of 0.1–0.15 m from the arc. An everyone experiment was continued until the electrode was burned down.

Research results and discussion. Neither attempt to inflame the PUF sample by a spark was successful. Sparks bounced off the PUF sample and fell down. The characteristic dimensions of cooled iron droplets ranged from 0.2 to 3 mm.

An evaluation of τint. The authors applied a model of elastic interaction between a drop of molten iron and a rigid wall, assuming that the sum of the potential energy of the drop, associated with its surface, and the kine­tic energy of a spreading drop, if flattened, is conserved. The longest contact time is achieved for drops, featuring the maximum diameter of 3 mm: τint ≈ 0.004 s.

Estimation τmin. The authors applied the experimental modeling of the process, whereby the effect of an iron drop on PUF was replaced by the time-controlled effect, produced by a wooden cylinder (6 mm in diameter), inflamed at one edge. τmin ≈ 0.3 s. The ratio τint << τmin explains the inability of electric arc welding sparks to ignite the PUF wall.

Conclusions. Electric arc welding sparks, having a diameter of up to 3 mm, cannot ignite a vertical wall, made of rigid combustible polyurethane foam, in case of a side impact. The lack of ignition is explained by the short-term contact between the spark and the surface of the polyurethane foam.

About the Author

N. L. Poletaev
All-Russian Research Institute for Fire Protection of Ministry of Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters
Russian Federation

Nikolay L. Poletaev, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Leading Researcher

ID RISC:1093620

VNIIPO, 12, Bala­shikha, Moscow Region, 143903 



References

1. Fires and Fire Safety in 2020. D.M. Gordienko (ed.). Moskow, VNIIPO, 2021. (rus).

2. Song Jiayun, Wang Supan, Chen Haixiang. Safety distance for preventing hot particle ignition of building insulation materials. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters. 2014; 4(3):034005. DOI: 10.1063/2.1403405

3. Tang Gang, Zhou Lin, Zhang Ping, Han Zhongqiang, Chen Depeng, Liu Xiuyu et al. Effect of aluminum diethylphosphinate on flame retardant and thermal properties of rigid polyurethane foam compo¬sites. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2020; 140:625-636. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-019-08897-z

4. Pang Xiu-Yan, Xin Ya-Ping, Shi Xiu-Zhu, Xu Jian-Zhong. Effect of different size-modified expandable graphite and ammonium polyphosphate on the flame retardancy, thermal stability, physical, and mechanical properties of rigid polyurethane foam. Polymer Engineering & Science. 2019; 59(7):1381-1394. DOI: 10.1002/pen.25123

5. Zheng Xiaorui, Wang Guojian, Xu Wei. Roles of organically-modified montmorillonite and phosphorous flame retardant during the combustion of rigid polyurethane foam. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2014; 101:32-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.015

6. Haynes W.M. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. 95ed. CRC Press, 2014; 3-516.

7. Wang Supan, Chen Haixiang, Zhang Linhe. Thermal decomposition kinetics of rigid polyurethane foam and ignition risk by a hot particle. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2013; 131:4. DOI: 10.1002/app.39359

8. Urban J.L. Spot ignition of natural fuels by hot metal particles : doctor of Philosophy in Engineering. Mechanical Engineering in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley, 2017; 66.

9. Urban J.L., Zak C.D., Song J., Fernandez-Pello C. Smoldering spot ignition of natural fuels by a hot metal particle. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2017; 36(2):3211-3218. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.09.014

10. Urban J.L., Zak C.D., Fernandez-Pello C. Spot fire ignition of natural fuels by hot aluminum particles. Fire Technology. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10694-018-0712-4

11. Wang Supan, Zhang Yu, Huang Xinyan. Ignition of EPS foam by a hot moving hollow particle: Thre¬shold, auto-ignition, and fire point. Combustion and Flame. 2021; 232: 111524. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111524

12. Glushkov D.O., Kosintsev A.G., Kuznetsov G.V., Vysokomorny V.S. Experimental research and numerical simulation of gel fuel ignition by a hot particle. Fuel. 2021; 291:120172. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120172

13. Glushkov D.O., Kuznetsov G.V., Strizhak P.A., Taburchinov R.I. Numerical simulation of gel fuel gas-phase ignition by a local source of limited heat content. Acta Astronautica. 2019; 163:44-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.11.050

14. Glushkov D.O., Legros J.-C., Strizhak P.A., Zakharevich A.V. Experimental and numerical study of heat transfer and oxidation reaction during ignition of diesel fuel by a hot particle. Fuel. 2016; 175:105-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.042

15. Shi Xueqiang, Zhang Yutao, Chen Xiaokun, Zhang Yuanbo, Ma Qian. Characteristics of coal dust ignited by a hot particle. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2021; 153:225-238. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.07.021

16. Clay R., Keivens K., Carmignani L., Bhattacharjee S. Ignition of solid fuels: A new approach to study the time delay. 11th U.S. National Combustion Meeting Organized by the Western States Section of the Combustion Institute, March 24–27, 2019. Pasadena, California, 2019. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332182312

17. Günther M., Lorenzetti A., Schartel B. Fire phenomena of rigid polyurethane foams. Polymers. 2018; 10(10):1166. DOI: 10.3390/polym10101166

18. Wille G., Millot F., Rifflet J.C. Thermophysical properties of containerless liquid iron up to 2500 K. International Journal of Thermophysics. 2002; 23(5):1197-1206. DOI: 10.1023/a:1019888119614

19. Riboux G., Gordillo J.M. Maximum drop radius and critical Weber number for splashing in the dynamical Leidenfrost regime. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2016; 803:516-527. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.496

20. Yang Jiuling, Wang Supan, Chen Haixiang. Effect of interface thermal resistance on ignition of reactive material by a hot particle. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2016; 97:146-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.01.070


Review

For citations:


Poletaev N.L. A research on rigid polyurethane foam resistibility to ignition from an electric arc welding spark. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2022;31(1):14-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/0869-7493.2022.31.01.14-20

Views: 258


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-7493 (Print)
ISSN 2587-6201 (Online)