The analysis of emergency situations related to fires at nuclear power plants

Introduction. The article provides a system and statistical analysis of emergency situations associated with fires at nuclear power plants (NPPs) in various countries of the world for the period from 1955 to 2019. The countries, where fires occurred at nuclear power plants, were identified (the USA, Great Britain, Switzerland, the USSR, Germany, Spain, Japan, Russia, India and France). Facilities, exposed to fires, are identified; causes of fires are indicated. The types of reactors where accidents and incidents, accompanied by large fires, have been determined.
The analysis of major emergency situations at nuclear power plants accompanied by large fires. During the period from 1955 to 2019, 27 large fires were registered at nuclear power plants in 10 countries. The largest number of major fires was registered in 1984 (three fires), all of them occurred in the USSR. Most frequently, emergency situations occurred at transformers and cable channels — 40 %, nuclear reactor core — 15 %, reactor turbine — 11 %, reactor vessel — 7 %, steam pipeline systems, cooling towers — 7 %. The main causes of fires were technical malfunctions — 33 %, fires caused by the personnel — 30 %, fires due to short circuits — 18 %, due to natural disasters (natural conditions) — 15 % and unknown reasons — 4 %. A greater number of fires were registered at RBMK — 6, VVER — 5, BWR — 3, and PWR — 3 reactors.
Conclusions. Having analyzed accidents, involving large fires at nuclear power plants during the period from 1955 to 2019, we come to the conclusion that the largest number of large fires was registered in the USSR. Nonetheless, to ensure safety at all stages of the life cycle of a nuclear power plant, it is necessary to apply such measures that would prevent the occurrence of severe fires and ensure the protection of personnel and the general public from the effects of a radiation accident.

1. Hall J.R., Harwood B. The national estimates approach to US fire statistics. Fire Technology. 1989; 25(2):99-113.

2. The IAEA. Assessment of the fire hazard analysis of nuclear power plants. Vienna. 1995; 52.

3. Kim S., Lee S. Maximum likelihood estimation of probabilistic non-suppression model for OECD NPP electrical fire applying non-negative continuous distribution. Fire Safety Journal. 2021; 122:103323. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103323

4. Nayak A., Kulkarni P. Severe accidents in nuclear reactors. Woodhead Publishing, 2021.

5. Thomson J.R. High integrity systems and safety management in hazardous industries. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2021; 360.

6. Wang J., Li X., Allison C., Hohorst J. Nuclear power plant design and analysis codes. Woodhead Publishing, 2020; 608.

7. Kumar S. Reliability and probabilistic safety assessment in multi-unit nuclear power plants. Academic Press, 2021; 260.

8. Petrangeli G. Nuclear Safety. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2019; 586.

9. Titov S.A., Kobelev A.M., Barbin N.M., Omelchenko D.V. Fires at nuclear power plants. Actual Problems and Innovations in Ensuring Security : a collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation, dedicated to the 30th anniversary of the EMERCOM of Russia (December 14–16, 2020). Part 1. Ekaterinburg, Ural Institute of GPS of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia, 2021; 157-159. (rus).

10. Shoigu S.K. Chernobyl 25 years later. Moscow, 2011; 5. (rus).

11. Klyuchnikov A.A., Pazukhin E.M., Shigera Yu.M., Shigera V.Yu. Nuclear power plant radioactive waste and methods of handling them. Kiev, Institute for Safety Problems of NPPs of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2005; 50-77. (rus).

12. Solovyova S.P. Accidents and incidents at nuclear power plants. Training manual. Obninsk, 1992; 134-273. (rus).

13. IAEA. Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant report of the Director General. Austria, 2015; 14-127.

14. Arutyunyan R.V., Bolshov L.A., Borovoy A.A., Velikhov E.P. System analysis of the causes and consequences of the accident at the Fukushima-1 NPP. Moscow, 2018; 408. (rus).

15. Prister B.S., Klyuchnikov A.A., Baryakhtar V.G., Shestopalov V.M., Kukhar V.P. Problems of nuclear power engineering safety. Chernobyl, 2016; 71-77. (rus).

16. Barbin N.M., Titov S.A., Kobelev M. Accidents that occurred at nuclear power plants in 1952–1972. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021; 666(2):022018. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/666/2/022018

17. Titov S.A., Barbin N.M., Zubarev I.A., Kobelev A.M. Emergency situations at nuclear power plants in the USA, Russia and in the countries of Western Europe for the period 1972–1982. Complex problems of technosphere safety. Campaign “My City is Getting Ready”: Tasks, Problems, Prospects: a collection of articles based on the materials of the XVI International Scientific and Practical Conference (Voronezh, October 1-31, 2020). Voronezh, 2020; 256-258. (rus).

18. Kobelev A.M., Barbin N.M., Terentyev D.I., Zubarev I.A., Titov S.A. Environmental impacts when possible beyond design basis accidents at nuclear power plants with reactors of type RBMK-1000 and the EGP-6. Complex problems of technosphere safety. Campaign “My City is Getting Ready”: Tasks, Problems, Prospects: a collection of articles based on the materials of the XVI International Scientific and Practical Conference (Voronezh, October 1-31, 2020). Voronezh, 2020; 391-394. (rus).

19. Dhillon B.S. Safety, Reliability, Human Factors, and Human Error in Nuclear Power Plants. CRC Press, 2017; 62-88. DOI: 10.1201/b22260

20. Yakovlev R.M., Obukhova I.A. Towards safe nuclear energy. Biosphere. 2017; 9(2):123-135. DOI: 10.24855/biosfera.v9i2.354 URL: http://21bs.ru/index.php/bio/article/view/354 (rus).

21. IAEA. Safety of nuclear power plant design. Vienna, 2016; 116.

22. IAEA. Assessment of the state of development of the national nuclear infrastructure of the IAEA. Vienna, 2009. NG-T-3.2; 82.

23. Brushlinsky N.N., Sokolov S.V. How much is the fire “cost” in the modern world? Fire and Explosion Safety/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2020; 29(1):79-88. DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2020.29.01.79-88 (rus)