Calculated assessment of effectiveness of class B fire suppression using automatic fire sprinkler systems
https://doi.org/10.22227/0869-7493.2021.30.03.88-98
Abstract
Introduction. The problem of timely activation of fire sprinkler systems is highly relevant for effective fire suppression before the critical moment, when calculated values applied to extinguish the fire, become ineffective. A number of works address the problem of effective application of the fire sprinkler system to Class A fires. The application of such methods to Class B fires has not yet been considered.
The model simulating a fire in a room with an automatic fire extinguishing system. The response time assessment model, developed by the co-authors for an automatic water-consuming fire sprinkler system, allows to identify the velocity of flame spreading over the surface of an HFL/CL spillage and the temperature rise rate in the ceiling area in the case of a B class fire.
A sprinkler is triggered by the bulb bursting caused by the thermal effect produced by the ascending convection flow. A model has been developed to determine the response time of a fire sprinkler system exposed to the effect of a heat flow, caused by the Class B fire, on a heat-sensitive sprinkler bulb.
Activation of a fire sprinkler system by the rate-of-rise heat detector. A model, designated for determining the activation time of a rate-of-rise heat detector, was developed.
Examples. A number of examples, illustrating the response time of traditional, deluge, and forced launch fire sprinkler systems, are provided in the article.
Conclusions. The obtained formula allows to quickly check the applicability of different types of fire sprinkler systems to ensure the effective protection of premises in which class B fires may break out.
About the Authors
L. T. TanklevskiyRussian Federation
Leonid T. Tanklevskiy, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Head of Department of Higher School of Technosphere Safety, Chief of Research Officer
Polytechnicheskaya St., 29, Saint Petersburg, 195251
Moskovskiy Avenue, 149, Saint Petersburg, 196105
ID RISC: 181476
Scopus Author ID: 57192367552
ResearcherID: S-1901-2017
A. A. Tarantsev
Russian Federation
Alexander A. Tarantsev, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Professor
Moskovskiy Avenue, 149, Saint Petersburg, 196105
12-ya Liniya VO, 13, Saint Petersburg, 199178,
ID RISC: 664653
Scopus Author ID: 57195636448
ResearcherID: K-2087-2018
I. A. Babikov
Russian Federation
Igor A. Babikov, Graduate Student of Department of Higher School of Technosphere Safety
Polytechnicheskaya St., 29, Saint Petersburg, 195251
ID RISC: 949758
Scopus Author ID: 57205082476
ResearcherID: S-5502-2017
D. V. Polyakov
Russian Federation
Dmitriy V. Polyakov, Deputy Head of Department
Borisa Galushkina St., 4, Moscow, 129366
ID RISC: 769985
References
1. Fire load. Handbook. SITIS-SPN-1 : revision 3. SITIS, 2014; 51. (rus).
2. Drysdale D. Introduction to fire dynamics. Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1990; 434. (rus).
3. Heskestad G. Fire Plumes, Flame Height, and Air Entrainment. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. 3rd ed. Quincy MA, NFPA, 2002; 2-1-2-17.
4. Alpert R.L. Ceiling Jet Flows. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. 3rd ed. Quincy MA, NFPA, 2002; 2-18-2-31.
5. Ishchenko A.D., Klyuy V.V., Polynko S.V., Tarantsev A.A. About building a revised combined graphics the calculation of forces and means to extinguish the fire. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/ Fire and Explosion Safety. 2018; 27(2-3):82-92. DOI: 10.18322/PVB.2018.27.02-03.82-92 (rus).
6. Tanklevskiy L.T., Tarantsev A.A., Zybina O.A., Babikov I.A. The efficiency assessment of an automatic sprinkler system. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2021; 30(1):42-53. DOI: 10.22227/PVB.2021.30.01.42-53 (rus).
7. Puzach S.V. Calculation methods of heat and mass transfer in a fire in a room and their application in solving practical problems of fire and explosion safety : monograph. Moscow, Academy of State Fire Service of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia, 2005; 336. (rus).
8. Drysdale D. An introduction to fire dynamics. Chichester, John Wiley and Sons, 1985; 424.
9. Heskestad G., Bill R.G., Jr. Quantification of thermal responsiveness of automatic sprinklers including conduction effects. Fire Safety Journal. 1988; 14(1-2):113-125. DOI: 10.1016/0379-7112(88)90049-5
10. Fleming R.P. Automatic sprinkler system calculations. SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. 3rd ed. Quincy MA, NFPA, 2002; 4-72-4-87.
11. Tanklevskiy L.T., Babikov I.A., Tarantsev A.A., Zybina O.A. On a more precise assessment of coordinates of the seat of fire in the premises. Fire and Explosion Safety. 2020; 29(3):33-43. DOI: 10.22227/PVB.2020.29.03.33-43 (rus).
12. Babikov I.A., Tanklevskiy A.L., Tarantsev A.A. Determination method of sprinklers with electrical activation in case of internal fire. Problems of risk management in the technosphere. 2019; 3(51):34-41. (rus).
13. Tanklevskiy L., Kopylov S., Vasilev M., Zima V., Snegirev A. Advantages of electronically controlled sprinklers (ECS) for fire protection of tunnels. Proceedings from the Fifth International Symposium on Tunnel Safety and Security, New York, USA, March 14–16, 2012. New York, 2012; 1:87-92.
14. National fire protection association. NFPA Handbook, 15th 1981 Edition.
15. Tanklevskiy L., Vasiliev M., Meshman L., Snegirev A., Tsoi A. A novel methodology of electrically controlled sprinkler activation. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Interflam Conference. 24–26 June 2013 London, UK. London, 2013; 503-508.
16. Tanklevskiy L., Kopylov S., Vasilev M., Zima V., Snegirev A. Advantages of electronically controlled sprinklers (ECS) for fire protection of tunnels. Proceedings from the Fifth International
17. Symposium on Tunnel Safety and Security (New York, USA, 14-16th March, 2012). SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, 2012; 1:87-92.
18. Meshman L.M., Tsarichenko S.G., Bylinkin V.A., Aleshin V.V., Gubin R.Y. Design of water and foam automatic fire extinguishing systems; N.P. Kopylov (ed.). VNIIPO, 2002; 413. (rus).
19. Safronov V.V., Aksenova E.V. Selection and calculation of parameters of fire extinguishing and alarm systems : textbook. Orel, Orel State Technical University, 2004. (rus).
20. Voronkov O.Y. Calculation, installation and operation of automatic fire-extinguishing installations : textbook. Omsk, Publishing house OmSTU, 2016. (rus).
21. Ilyushov N.Ya. Automatic fire extinguishing installations : textbook. Novosibirsk, Publishing house of NSTU, 2016; 134. (rus).
22. Khrapsky S.F., Starikov V.I., Ryssev D.V. Industrial and fire automation: textbook. Omsk, Publishing house of OmSTU, 2013; 152. (rus).
23. Tsoi A., Snegirev A., Tanklevskiy L., Sheinman I. Flame suppression by water sprays: Exploring capabilities and failures of FDS. Proceedings of the Seventh International Seminar Fire and Explosion Hazards. Research Publishing Services, 2013; 482-491. DOI: 10.3850/978-981-07-5936-0_07-05
24. Yao C. Application of sprinkler technology. Presented at Workshop on Engineering Applications of Fire Technology. National Bureau of Standards. 1980.
25. Xin Y., Burchesky K., de Vries J., Magistrale H., Xiangyang Zhou, D’Aniello S. SMART Sprinkler Protection for Highly Challenging Fires — Part 1: System Design and Function Evaluation // Fire Technology. 2017. Vol. 53. No. 5. Рp. 1847–1884. DOI: 10.1007/s10694-017-0662-2
26. Tarantsev A.A., Tanklevsky L.T., Snegirev A.Y., Tsoy A.S., Kopylov S.N., Meshman L.M. Assessment of the sprinkler installation efficiency. Pozharnaya bezopasnost’/Fire Safety. 2015; 1:72-79. (rus).
27. Bullen M.L. The effect of a sprinkler on the stability of a smoke layer beneath a ceiling. Fire Technology. 1977; 13(1):21-34. DOI: 10.1007/bf02338883
28. Grudanova O.V., Tarantsev A.A., Koroleva L.A. On economic evaluation of two ways of modernization of automatic fire extinguishing installations. Problems of risk management in the technosphere. 2007; 1:38-42. (rus).
29. Bubyr N.F., Vorobyev R.P., Bystrov Y.V., Zuikov G.M. Operation of the fire-fighting automatic installations; Bubyr N.F. (ed.). Moscow, Stroyizdat Publ., 1986; 367. (rus).
30. Malinin V.R., Korobeinikova E.G. Categorization of premises and buildings according to explosion and fire hazard : textbook. Saint-Petersburg: Saint-Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2002; 82. (rus).
31. Demidovich B.P., Maron I.A., Shuvalova E.Z. Numerical methods of analysis. 3rd ed., revised. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1967; 368. (rus).
32. Kamke E. Handbook of ordinary differential equations. 5th ed., stereotyped. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1976; 576. (rus).
33. Khasanov I.R., Karpov A.V., Lobova S.F., Petrova N.V. Field modeling of the fire dynamics as an answer to the question about the fire alarm performance. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2020; 29(5):40-50. DOI: 10.22227/PVB.2020.29.05.40-50 (rus).
34. Gorban Yu.I., Nemchinov S.G. Fire-fighting robots are in the fire automation: science and technology studies, the behavior of algorithms and design. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2020; 29(5):82-88. (rus).
35. Meshman L.M. Special issues on design water AFEI. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2019; 28(1):80-88. (rus).
36. Meshman L.M. Effect of irrigation intensity design value dictating the sprinkler on the hydraulic parameters of the distribution network AFES. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2019; 28(2):93-97. (rus).
Review
For citations:
Tanklevskiy L.T., Tarantsev A.A., Babikov I.A., Polyakov D.V. Calculated assessment of effectiveness of class B fire suppression using automatic fire sprinkler systems. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost/Fire and Explosion Safety. 2021;30(3):88-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22227/0869-7493.2021.30.03.88-98